Skill UI

This guide outlines the professional and technical process for authors responding to peer reviewers after a major conference submission (e.g., ICDT). It emphasizes that the revision must be a substantive correction—closing all identified proofs gaps, clarifying models, and documenting changes—rather than a mere argument or debate over taste. It provides a structured, point-by-point approach for maximizing the chances of acceptance.

This skill guides the transformation of quantitative research findings (models, experiments, empirical results) into structured, actionable managerial insights. It enforces the 'Condition-Decision-Effect' framework, ensuring that every policy suggestion is directly traceable to specific data points, parameters, or experimental findings. Essential for authors aiming to publish high-impact academic papers in management science.

This guide helps authors structure lengthy academic manuscripts, ensuring the main text maintains a clear, focused narrative while relegating supportive, detailed evidence to the appendices or supplementary materials. It outlines the 'determinative' principle, advising where to place hyperparameters, extended experiments, proof details, and code links to meet high journal standards and maximize readability for reviewers.

This skill guides researchers through the entire end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a research paper to a journal. It structures a 12-step pipeline, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature review to experimentation, reproducibility, submission, peer review, revision, and final camera-ready versioning. It acts as a comprehensive project dashboard for managing the entire academic publishing journey.

This guide outlines the proper placement of various research materials—including proofs, code, and extended results—within major academic conference submissions. It helps authors understand which content must be presented in the main body, which belongs in appendices, and how to correctly manage supplementary manuscripts and code/data supplements to maximize the chance of reviewer acceptance.

This guide provides a structured methodology for positioning academic research manuscripts, particularly for top-tier journals like the International Economic Review (IER). It teaches authors how to articulate a novel contribution (the 'delta') by defining the current academic frontier, identifying consequential gaps, and demonstrating how their work is both methodologically rigorous and generally applicable, thus justifying its placement against competing publications.

A comprehensive guide for developing robust and general economic models suitable for top-tier theoretical journals like the International Economic Review (IER). It teaches authors how to identify load-bearing assumptions, analytically prove existence and uniqueness, and structure arguments to demonstrate that results are intrinsic properties of the economy, not mere artifacts of functional form.

This guide provides detailed standards for structuring and writing manuscripts submitted to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It mandates a precise, methods-forward, and quantitative voice, ensuring the paper is accessible to both Operations Research (OR) and Computer Science (CS) audiences. Key elements covered include abstract structure (≤300 words, no formulas), rapid contribution framing in the introduction, and using numbered pseudocode for methods.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers focused on Internet Measurement (IMC). It teaches authors how to restructure their work to prioritize measurable findings, ensuring the narrative leads with the core discovery, making methodologies fully auditable, integrating ethical considerations early, and adopting the appropriate academic discipline for networking conferences.

A comprehensive guide for revising technical papers, specifically tailored for submission to top-tier robotics conferences like IROS. It teaches how to restructure narratives from 'demo-speak' to quantitative, evidence-based claims, focusing on a task-first opening, integrated system description, and mandatory figure-first presentation within strict page budgets.

A comprehensive guide for managing the high-stakes rebuttal and revision period after major academic conference submissions. It teaches authors how to strategically triage reviewer objections (factual errors, evidence gaps, design flaws) by their leverage, structure the written response for maximum committee impact, and perform surgical revisions without inadvertently restructuring the core paper.

A comprehensive guide for authors revising technical papers for top-tier conferences like ISSTA. It details the necessary structure, emphasizing strict scope definition, establishing clear evaluation contracts (subjects, baselines, metrics), pairing every claim with concrete evidence, and adhering to specialized review discipline.