Skill UI

This guide facilitates comprehensive tabletop exercises simulating major ransomware incidents. It systematically tests an organization's preparedness, decision-making processes, and communication protocols across executive, legal, PR, and technical teams. Scenarios cover double extortion, regulatory compliance (GDPR, HIPAA), and varying backup compromise levels, helping organizations identify critical gaps before a real-world attack.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning an accepted, anonymous conference submission into the final, public camera-ready version for publication. It covers de-anonymization steps, including restoring author details, updating proceedings metadata, reflowing figures for multiagent papers, and integrating rebuttal promises without expanding the core contribution. This ensures adherence to strict publishing standards.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a technical author response (rebuttal) for peer-reviewed academic papers (CAV). It teaches authors how to structure a rebuttal by addressing specific objections related to proof soundness, benchmark fairness, novelty, and scope, using only verifiable evidence, not future promises.

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting effective, double-blind rebuttals for top-tier academic conferences. Learn how to strategically address reviewer concerns regarding evidence realism, baseline fairness, energy accounting, and deployment honesty, using only existing data without making unsubstantiated promises.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for drafting authoritative author responses during academic conference reviews (e.g., ISSTA). It covers triage strategies, distinguishing between factual corrections and promised changes, and structuring a Major-Revision ledger. Learn how to address reviewer concerns strategically, maintain anonymity, and anchor all claims to evidence for maximizing acceptance chances.

This comprehensive guide details the complex nine-week process of transforming an accepted academic manuscript into the final, published camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring acknowledgments and affiliations), executing promised revisions, adherence to publisher formatting rules (ACM/IEEE), preparing artifact links, and structuring the accompanying presentation talk.

This guide details the critical steps for authors preparing their accepted paper for final publication in MLSys proceedings. It covers de-anonymization, restoring company and repository identity, reconciling promised rebuttals, and ensuring metadata accuracy for long-term findability. Essential for managing the complex post-acceptance timeline.

This guide details the critical process of transforming an accepted, anonymous conference paper into its final, published, open-access version for the ACL Anthology. It covers the essential 'three-source merge' process: integrating reviewer-promised revisions, restoring author identity and community acknowledgements, correcting metadata, and managing conference logistics. Essential reading for authors submitting to top-tier NLP venues like NAACL.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors responding to reviewer objections after a major technical conference submission (e.g., PLDI). It details how to triage structural critiques—including factual errors, soundness doubts, and evaluation gaps—and emphasizes maintaining academic rigor, adhering strictly to the original scope, and avoiding promises of unproven new contributions.

This guide outlines the comprehensive steps required to convert an accepted, anonymous academic paper into its final, published 'camera-ready' version for major conferences (e.g., RecSys). It covers crucial tasks such as restoring author details, affiliations, funding, integrating rebuttal promises, ensuring proper ACM two-column reflow, and managing public code/data repository release.

A comprehensive guide for drafting constrained author responses during major technical conference review periods (e.g., SOSP). Learn how to effectively correct factual errors and answer direct reviewer questions while strictly adhering to word limits and avoiding the introduction of new data or future work promises. Focus on precision and clarity for the Program Committee.

A comprehensive guide detailing the strategy, structure, and tactical writing needed for successful academic conference rebuttals (e.g., UIST). Learn how to manage character limits, prioritize factual corrections, promise concrete changes, and structure arguments to survive committee skimming, maximizing your chances of acceptance.