Skill UI

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating whether an economics manuscript is suitable for top-tier, general-interest journals like the JEEA. It guides authors on elevating niche findings into broadly relevant contributions, covering general-interest framing, methodological rigor (e.g., modern econometrics), structural house style, and pre-submission checklists for top-5 economics outlets.

This guide helps authors prepare manuscripts for high-impact journals, specifically detailing the mandatory requirements for data and code transparency (e.g., JPART). It outlines how to build a complete, reproducible package, including master scripts, documentation (README), data availability statements, and managing potential data restrictions, ensuring publication acceptance is not stalled by materials.

A detailed guide for researchers preparing manuscripts for public economics journals (e.g., JPubE). It outlines best practices for creating a fully auditable, reproducible research package, focusing on data-availability statements, handling restricted administrative data (like tax or health records), and adhering to journal Option C requirements.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors seeking to polish their manuscripts for top-tier urban economics journals. It focuses on restructuring the narrative to prioritize the spatial mechanism, ensuring the introduction, abstract, and results are grounded in concrete geography and interpretable policy magnitudes, rather than general statistical significance or abstract jargon.

This comprehensive guide details the complex nine-week process of transforming an accepted academic manuscript into the final, published camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring acknowledgments and affiliations), executing promised revisions, adherence to publisher formatting rules (ACM/IEEE), preparing artifact links, and structuring the accompanying presentation talk.

This skill guides the architectural organization of complex academic papers, ensuring that the argument unfolds in the clearest possible order within strict word limits. It focuses on the roadmap, the sequence of premises, handling objections, and structuring the introduction and conclusion, rather than sentence-level prose. Use it when your argument is sound but the draft lacks structural clarity or wanders off-topic.

This guide details the critical steps for authors preparing their accepted paper for final publication in MLSys proceedings. It covers de-anonymization, restoring company and repository identity, reconciling promised rebuttals, and ensuring metadata accuracy for long-term findability. Essential for managing the complex post-acceptance timeline.

A comprehensive guide for the late-stage polishing of academic manuscripts for submission to M&SOM. It focuses on restructuring the narrative to lead with the operational insight, developing a structured, jargon-free abstract, controlling mathematical notation, and adhering to strict INFORMS author-year citation styles and page limits.

This guide details the critical process of transforming an accepted, anonymous conference paper into its final, published, open-access version for the ACL Anthology. It covers the essential 'three-source merge' process: integrating reviewer-promised revisions, restoring author identity and community acknowledgements, correcting metadata, and managing conference logistics. Essential reading for authors submitting to top-tier NLP venues like NAACL.

A guide for structuring the discussion section of academic papers, moving beyond mere result restatement. It teaches how to theoretically advance existing management theories by demonstrating extension, defining boundary conditions, or achieving theoretical integration, ensuring the paper closes the gap established in the introduction.

This guide details the rigorous process of converting an accepted NDSS paper into the final open-access, camera-ready version. It covers mandatory steps such as fulfilling revision conditions, deliberately de-anonymizing the work (restoring vendor names, DOIs, and disclosure specifics), adding earned artifact badges, and completing a comprehensive production checklist to ensure publication quality for the Internet Society proceedings.

This guide assists researchers in transforming bloated or loosely structured academic manuscripts into the terse, plain IMRAD format required by top-tier journals like NEJM. It focuses on maximizing clarity, enforcing claim-first results based on statistical evidence, curbing over-stated clinical implications, and ensuring the discussion explicitly covers limitations and necessary scope restriction.