Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers focused on Internet Measurement (IMC). It teaches authors how to restructure their work to prioritize measurable findings, ensuring the narrative leads with the core discovery, making methodologies fully auditable, integrating ethical considerations early, and adopting the appropriate academic discipline for networking conferences.

A comprehensive guide for revising technical papers submitted to top-tier networking conferences (like INFOCOM). It emphasizes structural rigor, defensive writing techniques, pairing every claim with proportional evidence, and adhering strictly to page limitations to proactively address reviewer objections before the rebuttal phase.

A comprehensive guide for the final pre-submission quality check of academic manuscripts, particularly for double-blind review processes. It covers critical compliance points such as maintaining anonymity, adhering to strict word counts (including figures/tables), managing separate metadata (abstracts, acknowledgments), and ensuring proper third-person self-citation to avoid common rejection pitfalls.

A comprehensive guide for developing rigorous theory for Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscripts. It outlines two primary theorizing modes—Behavioral (focusing on explicit causal mechanisms centered on the IT artifact) and Analytical (deriving propositions from economic/equilibrium models). The framework emphasizes making the theory sociotechnical by bridging traditional IS silos and ensuring the IT artifact is the load-bearing theoretical element, moving beyond simple correlation to mechanistic insight.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier chemistry journals like JACS. This skill helps authors pre-empt reviewer objections, select appropriate suggested and excluded experts, and rigorously stress-test the manuscript's scope, characterization, and mechanistic claims before formal submission. It transforms the writing process into a defensible, high-quality academic product.

This guide helps researchers rigorously evaluate their chemical findings against the high standards of flagship journals like JACS. It teaches how to assess both the 'Advance' (novelty and importance) and 'Breadth' (general applicability) of a discovery, ensuring the manuscript is pitched correctly to avoid subfield-only publications. It also advises on choosing the appropriate format (Article vs. Communication).

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a point-by-point rebuttal letter after receiving a major revision decision from a top-tier academic journal. It emphasizes strategic communication, prioritizing the Senior Editor's concerns, addressing technical issues in the appropriate disciplinary 'currency,' and maintaining a developmental, professional tone to maximize the chances of acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for writing and auditing scientific manuscripts according to JAMA standards. It enforces the proper structured headings (e.g., Importance, Objective, Results) and mandates the inclusion of quantitative data like effect sizes and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). This skill ensures the abstract and Key Points are concise, consistent, and highly focused on primary outcomes.

This guide helps authors structure and sharpen the core contribution of an empirical paper for applied econometrics journals. It emphasizes shifting focus from pure theory to replicable findings derived from real data, ensuring claims are properly calibrated, and optimizing the 100-word summary for maximum impact.

This router is designed to guide authors through the entire, highly structured process of developing and submitting an academic manuscript specifically to the Journal of Accounting Research (JAR). It does not perform the research itself but acts as a decision tool, directing the user to the next most appropriate specialized skill—whether it's refining the core topic, strengthening the economic theory, executing data analysis, or drafting a rebuttal response—ensuring a coherent and high-quality research workflow.

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-impact journals like JBF. It details complex requirements such as double anonymization, mandatory fees, separate title pages, abstract length constraints, data statements, and proper declaration of generative AI use, ensuring manuscripts are journal-compliant before hitting 'submit'.

This comprehensive guide polishes academic manuscripts specifically for submission to a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR). It teaches authors to reformat their prose to lead with consumer insights rather than methods, ensuring the text is legible to a broad, interdisciplinary audience. It also enforces adherence to specific academic standards, including Chicago house style, managing the abstract length (≤200 words), and proper double anonymization techniques.