Skill UI

A guide for pausing and asking targeted questions whenever requirements are vague, ensuring the team locks in objectives, scope, constraints, and acceptance criteria before any implementation begins.

A guide for pausing and asking targeted questions whenever requirements are vague, ensuring the team locks in objectives, scope, constraints, and acceptance criteria before any implementation begins.

Simulates a multi-perspective council of thinking archetypes to analyze decisions, research trade-offs, and creative challenges. Separates evidence from assumptions and values, then synthesizes a conditional recommendation with open questions.

This mode acts as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through ambiguous problems, complex decisions, and open-ended strategy questions. Instead of providing direct answers, it focuses on challenging assumptions, asking clarifying questions, surfacing multiple perspectives (e.g., stakeholder views), and helping the user structure their thought process using advanced techniques like reframing, pre-mortem analysis, and identifying critical constraints. Ideal for product managers and leaders who need to explore ideas without a clear path forward.

An essential orchestrator for authors submitting manuscripts to Agricultural Systems. This tool guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, helping them determine the appropriate article type (e.g., Review, Perspective) and ensuring the core research question addresses true systems complexity, interactions, and trade-offs, rather than single-factor trials. It maps the manuscript stage to the necessary sub-skills.

This guide provides an in-depth analysis of the CIKM peer review process, which operates under double-blind rules and integrates perspectives from three distinct fields: Information Retrieval, Data Mining, and Knowledge Management. It details how authors can optimize their submissions to satisfy diverse expert standards, how to interpret complex, multi-faceted review reports, and the critical dynamics that determine a paper's acceptance status.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a single-page academic rebuttal after conference reviews (e.g., CVPR). It teaches authors how to strategically address multiple reviews, correct factual errors, and clarify scope within strict formatting and content limitations, focusing on the Area Chair's perspective and emphasizing data over adjectives.

A comprehensive skill tool designed to guide authors on submitting manuscripts to *Economic Perspectives*. It helps users evaluate if their work meets the journal's high standards for theoretical depth, economic mechanism explanation, and scholarly rigor. It covers structure, scope, and common rejection pitfalls, serving as a pre-submission quality check.

This guide provides a structured methodology for translating highly technical academic papers, particularly in econometrics or macroeconomics, into plain language suitable for a broad scholarly audience (like the Journal of Economic Perspectives). It focuses on removing notation, jargon, and complex mathematical derivations, while rigorously preserving the underlying economic intuition and causal mechanism of the research.

This guide details the unique, editor-driven submission process for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It advises authors on managing scope, length, and framing when working with an editorial team, rather than anonymous referees. Key strategies include treating the proposal as a contract, prioritizing accessibility for a broad audience, and negotiating scope early in the process.

This guide provides strict principles for transforming dense, technical academic data (like regression tables or complex charts) into self-explanatory exhibits suitable for a broad, non-specialist audience, such as those reading the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). The focus is always on maximizing clarity and communicating a single, clear finding, prioritizing visual impact over statistical density.

A comprehensive guide for structuring persuasive proposals or symposium pitches for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). Learn how to convince editors that a balanced, accessible, and novel article or theme exists, focusing on the necessary components like the 'why now,' core takeaways, and balance plan, rather than writing the full manuscript.