Skill UI

A comprehensive coach designed to elevate all aspects of human communication. This skill covers public speaking techniques, persuasive presentation design, impactful storytelling, active listening, and professional written communication (emails, reports). It emphasizes theory combined with mandatory, structured practice and actionable feedback, helping users navigate various contexts, from board pitches to difficult conversations, while accounting for cultural communication norms.

This assistant helps generate clear, concise, and highly structured reports for stakeholders and leadership. It guides users in creating professional status updates, progress summaries, and executive reports, ensuring all key metrics, risks, and necessary actions (asks) are highlighted for maximum clarity and impact.

A comprehensive intelligence tool designed for clinical researchers to navigate the complex NIH grant landscape. It utilizes a detailed 6-step intake process (covering research idea, career stage, and data status) to perform a multi-faceted positioning analysis. The system maps research to appropriate NIH institutes using RePORTER data and generates an editable Word document containing actionable mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and strategic guidance for funding applications.

This agent provides a critical framework for navigating corporate environments, contrasting internal jargon and process visibility (Ding In) with objective, real-world evidence and user experience (Ding Out). It helps users move beyond subjective 'feelings' or polished reports, structuring complex tasks into verifiable components: Goal, Acceptance Criteria, Action, Evidence, and Risk. Ideal for project management, status reporting, and critical thinking in a corporate setting.

This skill produces comprehensive 360-degree feedback instruments or structured performance reports. It guides users through collecting multi-rater input across core competencies like leadership, communication, and execution. Ideal for performance reviews, professional development planning, and assessing employee impact. The output adheres to best practices, ensuring development-oriented and behaviorally anchored feedback.

This skill helps users create high-impact, standalone executive summaries for complex documents, reports, or proposals. It structures the summary with a clear bottom line, actionable recommendations, and key findings, ensuring busy senior stakeholders can grasp the core message and make a decision quickly.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting to Accounts of Chemical Research (ACS). It helps researchers understand the journal's unique niche: publishing concise, first-person, narrative accounts of a research program's evolution, rather than comprehensive field reviews or primary data reports. It serves as a fit-checking tool, guiding manuscript framing, required evidence, and house style.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to reviewer reports and editor decisions (major/minor revision, rejection). It details how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, what new data (e.g., stability, benchmarking) must be added, and how to ensure the revised manuscript maintains a clear scientific advance while adhering to publication guidelines.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for structuring theoretical economics manuscripts for submission to AEJ: Micro. It enforces the theory-first approach, ensuring the introduction immediately presents the economic question and states the main result in words, thus maximizing impact for a broad micro audience. It also covers specific AEA house style conventions, such as reporting standard errors and structuring the abstract.

A comprehensive guide for addressing rigorous academic peer review feedback, especially for top-tier journals. It provides a structured, point-by-point framework for authors to revise their work, focusing on strengthening the core theoretical framework, integrating coverage gaps, establishing critical attitude, and maintaining scholarly balance. Use this when responding to major revisions or full-review referee reports.

This guide helps researchers structure their discussion section and manuscript to explicitly articulate the theoretical contribution, moving beyond simple results reporting. It teaches how to identify, claim, and frame various types of theoretical advancements (e.g., new mechanisms, boundaries, or integrating literatures), ensuring the paper meets the high standards of top-tier academic journals like AMJ.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-step process for authors revising a mathematical or scientific manuscript following a detailed referee report. It emphasizes the critical rule: always fix mathematical gaps and errors in the text first, and only then draft a structured, point-by-point reply that is respectful, precise, and mathematically grounded.