Skill UI

Drafts structured, high-quality grant proposals for major international and national funding agencies (e.g., NSF, KAKENHI, ERC, NSFC). This skill guides the user through the entire grant writing pipeline, transforming validated research ideas and literature into a reviewer-ready application that meets specific structural, narrative, and formatting requirements, significantly increasing funding success rates.

This technique is designed for advanced academic research, enabling users to search for theses by running two parallel tracks: a Topic Track (focusing on discipline, methodology, and materials) and a People Track (focusing on university, advisor, degree type, and year). By switching between these two methodologies, users can cross-validate results and significantly improve the accuracy and completeness of their literature review.

A comprehensive mentor for graduate students and early-career researchers, guiding the entire research lifecycle. This skill covers formulating rigorous research questions, designing studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), conducting literature reviews, analyzing data, and writing publishable papers. It emphasizes methodological rigor, critical thinking, and ethical considerations.

This skill provides a systematic, structured framework for evaluating scientific manuscripts, research proposals, and grant applications. It assesses key academic components including methodology rigor, statistical validity, ethical compliance, reproducibility, and adherence to established reporting standards (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE). It is ideal for generating comprehensive, critical, and constructive feedback for academic publishing.

Systematically evaluates scholarly works, including research papers, proposals, and literature reviews, using the comprehensive ScholarEval framework. It assesses critical dimensions such as problem formulation, methodology rigor, data analysis, and academic writing quality. Provides both quantitative scoring and detailed, actionable feedback to benchmark research quality and determine publication readiness.

A comprehensive mentor guiding users through the entire lifecycle of academic literature reviews. It teaches systematic search strategies (PICO/PCC), critical appraisal methods, and advanced synthesis techniques. The skill covers searching major English and Chinese databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI), organizing findings, and effectively utilizing AI research tools like Elicit and Semantic Scholar to build robust, evidence-based research papers.