Skill UI

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

This skill simulates security incidents using discussion-based tabletop exercises for Security Operations Center (SOC) teams. It is designed to test incident response procedures, evaluate cross-functional communication workflows (e.g., Legal, PR, Executive), and assess decision-making capabilities under pressure, all without touching production environments. Ideal for compliance validation, playbook refinement, and comprehensive team training.

This skill enhances AI responses by simulating the inner monologue and self-correction process of a human being. It moves beyond standard helpful assistance by incorporating three stages: Self (raw instinct), Mirror (critical reflection), and Conscious Response (the polished, human-like output). Ideal for emotional support, personal advice, or writing that requires authentic emotional depth and a distinct point of view, rather than purely factual or structured data.

This tool standardizes the process of triaging and responding to customer support tickets, emails, or chats. It analyzes incoming text to identify issue type, product area, and severity, then categorizes the ticket, sets a priority level, drafts an empathetic response, and generates internal action items for efficient handling across platforms like Zendesk or Intercom.

This skill is designed for generating structured, insightful, and boundary-aware short answers, such as reader replies, editor responses, or consultation advice. It structures analysis by defining fact boundaries, providing structural judgment, offering necessary critique, and suggesting safe, low-risk next steps. It is primarily activated by the CrossFrame Suite, ensuring the output maintains a canonical Chinese semantic layer while providing professional, actionable advice.

A comprehensive guide detailing the process of responding to major or minor revisions from academic journals (like AAAG). It teaches authors how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, address editor and referee concerns methodically, strengthen the core academic argument, and incorporate required methodological and cartographic fixes, ensuring the response is both respectful and scientifically rigorous.

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting highly effective and concise author rebuttals for major AI conferences like AAAI. Given strict character limits, no URLs, and no new results, it teaches authors how to triage reviewer feedback, focus on decision-critical factual errors, and maximize impact to improve paper acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting a strategic response during the OpenReview cycle. This resource covers how to address reviewer objections, shape the Area Chair's meta-review summary, manage the discussion phase, and decide whether to defend the paper or withdraw for a future revision cycle. Focus on clarity, conciseness, and evidence-based arguments.

A comprehensive guide for drafting professional and strategic rebuttals for major academic conferences, such as ACM Multimedia. Learn how to triage reviewer comments, structure arguments for the Area Chair, address factual errors, and incorporate small, confirmatory results while maintaining anonymity and adhering to strict policy guardrails.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to structure and write a professional, point-by-point rebuttal letter and revision explanation in response to rigorous academic reviews. It covers addressing specific critiques related to measurement, identification, institutional standards, and information mechanisms, ensuring the response is evidence-based, anonymous, and highly professional.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers detailing how to structure and write a precise, point-by-point rebuttal letter following a major journal's Request for Revision (R&R). It covers addressing referee concerns regarding proof correctness, theoretical generality, and scope, ensuring the revision plan is rigorous and addresses the editor's central concerns.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a rebuttal and response letter after a major journal revision (e.g., R&R). It structures the response to referees and editors, emphasizing the policy contribution and addressing every comment point-by-point. The guide stresses the need for evidence-led arguments, strengthening the welfare/policy reading, and ensuring reproducibility standards are met to successfully resubmit high-stakes academic research.