Skill UI

Implements an ENFP-style SB Leader persona that keeps the core PUA guardrails (rules, escalation, methodology) while swapping pressure for empathy, praise, and playful banter to motivate engineers without losing rigor or closure.

Draft concise AAAI author responses (rebuttals) under strict character limits, no-URL rules, and no-new-results guidance. Prioritize decision-critical factual corrections, handle AI-generated reviews, and optimize limited space to influence SPC/AC discussions.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring supplementary material (technical appendices, code/data ZIPs, multimedia) for AAAI submissions. It emphasizes that core contributions and essential evidence must reside in the main paper, while appendices should only deepen the argument. It covers guidelines for maintaining double-blind anonymity, ensuring immutability, and achieving reproducibility.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

This skill guides authors on whether their concise energy science research meets the high-impact, selective criteria of ACS Energy Letters. It provides comprehensive guidelines covering journal positioning, required novelty, evidence rigor, and specific structural rules for areas like photovoltaics, batteries, and electrocatalysis, ensuring the submitted work is a timely and significant single advance.

A comprehensive guide for formatting academic manuscripts for the American Historical Review (AHR). This skill mandates adherence to the Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS) guidelines where all citations must be placed exclusively in footnotes or endnotes. It strictly prohibits the use of bibliography pages or in-text parenthetical citations, providing detailed rules for citing books, journals, digitized, and especially sensitive archival/manuscript sources.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final steps before submitting a manuscript to The American Historical Review (AHR) via ScholarOne. It ensures adherence to strict double-blind anonymity rules, specific formatting standards (Times New Roman, double-spaced, 8,000-word limit), Chicago manual style notes (no bibliography), and proper handling of image permissions, preventing common submission failures.

This skill guides authors in refining and polishing academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier political science journals, such as APSR. It teaches how to tighten prose, ensure cross-subfield readability, adhere to stringent formatting rules (APSA Style Manual), and manage strict word count limits without sacrificing intellectual rigor. Use this when preparing a final draft for publication.

This skill guides the polishing of academic manuscripts for high-level sociology journals like ASR. It ensures the writing is readable by a general sociologist outside the subfield, adheres strictly to the ASA Style Guide, and manages strict word caps (e.g., 15,000 words total, 200-word abstract). It focuses on clarity, structure, and adherence to formatting rules rather than generating new content.

This guide provides a detailed framework for authors to strategically place content within technical conference papers. It outlines the distinct roles of the extended abstract, main body, appendix, and artifact, ensuring that all acceptance-critical information is positioned where reviewers are required to read it. Following these rules maximizes the paper's chances of successful peer review acceptance.

This comprehensive guide instructs authors on the entire process of responding to reviewer reports (R&R) for academic journals. It details the mandatory structure, tone, and strategic approaches for writing a detailed, point-by-point rebuttal letter, ensuring compliance with double-blind review rules and maintaining academic rigor.

This guide provides an in-depth analysis of the CIKM peer review process, which operates under double-blind rules and integrates perspectives from three distinct fields: Information Retrieval, Data Mining, and Knowledge Management. It details how authors can optimize their submissions to satisfy diverse expert standards, how to interpret complex, multi-faceted review reports, and the critical dynamics that determine a paper's acceptance status.