Skill UI

This framework guides the creation of high-impact academic literature reviews, transforming a mere annotated bibliography into a cohesive, argumentative essay. It helps researchers impose a unifying 'spine'—such as a taxonomy, process model, or levels of analysis—to make complex psychological fields legible and accessible to non-specialist readers. Ideal for synthesizing scattered research into a single, powerful argument.

This skill guides the creation of high-impact exhibits—conceptual frameworks and synthesis tables—essential for academic review articles. It teaches how to structure complex literature, making the core argument (the "spine") visible and allowing readers to grasp the field's overall landscape through visual organization, rather than just through descriptive text. Focus is on organization and synthesis.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodology of 'close looking' crucial for academic art writing, particularly for Art Bulletin articles. It teaches how to move beyond mere description by systematically analyzing composition, facture, medium, and scale. Every visual claim must be supported by reproducible evidence, such as numbered figures or detail crops, ensuring the argument is grounded in verifiable observation, not mere assertion.

A detailed guide designed for researchers targeting top-tier economics journals, such as Finance & Trade Economics (CTE). It systematically helps users refine their manuscript by checking four critical areas: scope fit (fiscal, tax, trade, consumption), theoretical grounding, measurable marginal contributions, and appropriate journal matching. This ensures the research meets the high standards required for publication.

A comprehensive guide for managing large-scale academic conference submissions, specifically tailored for the EuroSys cycle. It provides detailed backward planning from deadlines, covering artifact preparation, navigating submission gates, and handling post-review outcomes (Accept/Revise/Reject) to ensure a smooth end-to-end publication process.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier Software Engineering (SE) conferences (like FSE, ICSE). It details how to structure the Related Work section by focusing on the 'delta'—the unique difference—between your work and prior art. It emphasizes covering the full SE literature landscape, maintaining anonymity, and correctly declaring overlaps with concurrent or prior versions.

This guide helps researchers elevate local, sub-field specific findings into global-scale scientific contributions. It teaches how to structure a manuscript by anchoring the work on driver-response literature, speaking across different Earth systems (e.g., terrestrial and marine), and engaging with major synthesis meta-analyses. Use this when your work needs to prove broader applicability beyond its initial data collection site.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured strategy for handling major scientific manuscript revisions and writing professional rebuttal letters. It instructs authors on how to systematically address every reviewer concern—especially regarding mechanism, scale, uncertainty, and reproducibility—while ensuring the revised manuscript remains perfectly synchronized with the archived data and code.

A comprehensive guide for academics on structuring and articulating the core, novel contribution of a scholarly paper, particularly in specialized fields like Game Theory and Economic Behavior. It provides a framework for crafting a single, highly impactful 'contribution sentence' and organizing the claim cascade (Headline, Why Open, Key Idea), ensuring the theoretical advance is immediately legible to specialized editors and reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for managing the high-stakes rebuttal and revision period after major academic conference submissions. It teaches authors how to strategically triage reviewer objections (factual errors, evidence gaps, design flaws) by their leverage, structure the written response for maximum committee impact, and perform surgical revisions without inadvertently restructuring the core paper.

A comprehensive guide detailing the specific conventions required for submitting high-quality, data-driven papers in computer architecture to top-tier conferences like ISCA. It covers structuring the core argument around a single insight, developing measured motivation sections, describing mechanisms with checkable precision, and calibrating quantitative claims with empirical data and instruments. Essential for academic research communication in hardware design.

This framework guides the creation of a structured, argumentative literature review, preventing the writing from becoming a mere annotated bibliography. By imposing a unifying taxonomy, model, or question sequence, the author transforms scattered research into a cohesive argument about the field. It helps define the 'spine' of the survey, identifies knowledge gaps, and reconciles apparent contradictions in existing literature.