Skill UI

This guide helps authors sharpen the academic contribution of public finance research. It instructs users on translating mere statistical findings (coefficients) into policy-relevant parameters, welfare verdicts (e.g., DWL, MVPF), or mechanisms that advance the understanding of the economic role of government. It emphasizes linking research outcomes to normative policy choices.

This skill provides a rigorous, late-stage editorial review pass tailored for submission to specialized public economics journals, such as JPubE. It ensures the manuscript adheres to strict academic conventions, focusing on concise abstract writing (≤250 words), structuring the introduction around the government policy question, and translating all quantitative estimates into actionable welfare or revenue terms for public finance specialists. It is designed to elevate clarity and impact for expert readers.

This tool guides the refinement of academic prose, specifically for submissions to Management Science (INFORMS). It focuses on transforming notation-dense text into clear, impactful, and highly readable manuscripts. Key practices include front-loading the core results, translating complex symbols into plain language intuition, and adopting a style suitable for a broad, cross-departmental academic audience.

This skill guides authors on how to explicitly identify, frame, and articulate the primary contribution of a Marketing Science manuscript. It forces the transition from merely presenting results to identifying the primary dimension (substantive, modeling, methodological, data, or practice) and translating academic findings into clear, decision-relevant managerial implications. Use this when the 'so what' of the research needs to be sharpened.

This guide provides a structured approach for writing high-stakes author responses to academic paper reviews (like those in OOPSLA). It teaches authors how to move beyond simple rebuttals by framing every concern as an argument supporting a desired outcome (Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject). Focus areas include quantifying feasibility, structuring the argument for committee skimming, and strategically shaping the scope of required revisions.

A comprehensive guide for authors aiming to submit top-tier technical papers (like those for OOPSLA). It teaches how to transform descriptive drafts into highly verifiable, structured academic arguments. Focus areas include developing running examples, articulating falsifiable claims, optimizing article pacing, and anticipating reviewer challenges to maximize the chances of acceptance.

This guide details how to structure and write the 'Related Work' section for highly competitive academic venues like PLDI. It emphasizes moving beyond simple citation listings by forcing the author to identify and articulate the specific technical 'delta' (improvement) their paper provides over every prior technique, while also covering inter-conference comparisons and proper bibliography formatting.

This skill is designed to polish the writing style and structure of interdisciplinary Research Policy manuscripts. It ensures that the core innovation-studies argument is clear and accessible to diverse readerships, including economists, management scholars, and policymakers. It focuses on structuring the narrative, translating field-specific jargon, and making the policy contribution visible and impactful throughout the paper.

This comprehensive guide outlines the scope, required evidence, and structural standards for submitting mechanistic immunology research to Science Immunology (Sci Immunol). It details how to position studies with translational relevance, emphasizing the combination of human clinical data with in vivo mouse models. It serves as a critical tool for authors to assess the manuscript's fit, adherence to AAAS standards, and overall scientific rigor before submission.

This guide instructs researchers on how to adapt academic manuscripts for a highly cross-disciplinary, policy-oriented audience, modeled after the standards of World Development (WD). It emphasizes shifting the focus from literature gaps or technical methods to concrete development problems, translating complex jargon and statistical findings into clear, actionable policy implications, ensuring maximum readability for non-specialist policymakers and scholars.

This skill serves as a comprehensive guide for authors targeting The William and Mary Quarterly. It helps users re-frame local studies into arguments that engage with the field's major debates concerning 'vast early America,' covering topics such as slavery, indigenous encounters, and transatlantic exchange. It details field positioning, historiographical intervention, and submission standards.