Skill UI

This comprehensive checklist guides authors submitting theory-only manuscripts to the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It ensures compliance with AOM formatting, rigorous anonymity standards, correct scope definition (must build new theory, no data), and ethical guidelines, minimizing desk rejection risk. It is designed for conceptual, non-empirical work.

A comprehensive guide to pressure-test whether a political science project meets the broad, general-interest criteria of the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS). It helps users frame their research question and contribution to maximize its appeal beyond single-country or subfield limitations, advising on optimal format choice and scope definition.

This framework guides researchers on transforming raw empirical crime findings into robust, field-level theoretical contributions for academic journals. It mandates the explicit definition of the causal mechanism, scope conditions, and observable implications, ensuring the work moves beyond simple correlation to make a significant theoretical argument.

This guide provides a strategic framework for authors responding to rigorous peer reviews in high-stakes academic venues. It details how to manage both short-term rebuttals and full revision submissions, covering objection triage (misreading, evidence gaps, adaptive attacks), precise scope definitions, and the formal documentation required for ethics and methodology. Learn to structure your response to maximize acceptance probability.

A comprehensive guide for authors revising technical papers for top-tier conferences like ISSTA. It details the necessary structure, emphasizing strict scope definition, establishing clear evaluation contracts (subjects, baselines, metrics), pairing every claim with concrete evidence, and adhering to specialized review discipline.