Skill UI

This guide helps researchers rigorously evaluate their chemical findings against the high standards of flagship journals like JACS. It teaches how to assess both the 'Advance' (novelty and importance) and 'Breadth' (general applicability) of a discovery, ensuring the manuscript is pitched correctly to avoid subfield-only publications. It also advises on choosing the appropriate format (Article vs. Communication).

This guide provides a framework for authors to elevate their research findings beyond mere correlation. It teaches how to articulate a strong, economically significant contribution to journals like JAE by identifying underlying mechanisms, resolving economic tensions, and establishing credible causal links. Ideal for refining introductions and discussions in quantitative academic papers.

A comprehensive guide for structuring academic manuscripts intended for top-tier journals like JAE. It teaches authors how to transition from merely identifying a research gap to joining and advancing an ongoing, seminal, economics-based scholarly conversation. Key focus areas include capital markets, financial contracting, and disclosure theory.

This comprehensive router guides researchers through the entire process of developing, analyzing, and submitting a manuscript to the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE). It provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the next critical step—from initial topic selection and theory development to advanced econometrics, contribution framing, and final submission preparation. It ensures that the work maintains a rigorous, economics-based argument using archival data, preventing common pitfalls like vague ideas or insufficient identification strategies.

A comprehensive guide for researchers on sharpening the theoretical contribution of academic manuscripts, especially for specialized journals like JAIS. It teaches authors how to transition from describing 'what they did' to articulating 'what the field now knows,' ensuring the work is generative, challenging, and structurally aligned with its chosen category (Theory, Empirical, etc.).

This guide provides expert strategies for polishing the prose of high-level academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for journals like JAIS. It focuses on transforming dense, jargon-heavy text into a clear, theory-forward narrative accessible to a diverse, cross-disciplinary reviewer pool. Use this when your research contribution is solid, but the writing structure or clarity needs refinement to maximize impact and adherence to academic standards (e.g., APA 6th, active voice).

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising security research papers intended for top-tier conferences like IEEE S&P (Oakland). It teaches authors how to structure their work to withstand rigorous reviewer scrutiny, focusing on passing the 'first-round survival test,' implementing load-bearing threat models, and calibrating all claims to remove hyperbole and ensure maximum impact within strict page limits.

A comprehensive guide for positioning scholarly research contributions, especially for top-tier academic journals. It teaches authors how to define the specific theoretical, empirical, and managerial gaps, defend against common reviewer critiques, and structure the manuscript narrative to demonstrate profound novelty and academic impact.

A comprehensive guide detailing the academic submission and review process for the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS). Learn about the double-anonymization, the developmental review philosophy, the dual evaluation criteria (theoretical and managerial contribution), and how to interpret complex decision letters (Desk Reject, Major Revision, etc.) to successfully frame your research.

This guide provides a structured methodology for academic researchers writing for top-tier journals (like JAR). It teaches how to move beyond merely stating empirical results to clearly articulating the specific, novel, and economically consequential contribution of the research. It emphasizes identifying the causal mechanism, the relative increment over prior work, and the broader theoretical or practical implications for the accounting field.

This guide outlines the rigorous method for developing econometrically testable hypotheses for accounting research, particularly for high-tier journals. Instead of relying on vague constructs, it teaches how to ground predictions in core economic theories like information economics, agency theory, and contracting frictions. It helps researchers build a clear mechanism by specifying the agent's optimization problem, identifying the core friction, and deriving conditional, testable predictions.

This router is designed to guide authors through the entire, highly structured process of developing and submitting an academic manuscript specifically to the Journal of Accounting Research (JAR). It does not perform the research itself but acts as a decision tool, directing the user to the next most appropriate specialized skill—whether it's refining the core topic, strengthening the economic theory, executing data analysis, or drafting a rebuttal response—ensuring a coherent and high-quality research workflow.