Skill UI

A comprehensive skill tool designed to guide authors on submitting manuscripts to *Economic Perspectives*. It helps users evaluate if their work meets the journal's high standards for theoretical depth, economic mechanism explanation, and scholarly rigor. It covers structure, scope, and common rejection pitfalls, serving as a pre-submission quality check.

This guide outlines comprehensive standards for creating self-contained, reproducible, and highly professional tables and figures for top-tier academic journals. It covers best practices for econometric reporting, including Monte Carlo error presentation, consistent precision, adhering to booktabs style, and ensuring every piece of data is traceable back to a fixed script and seed.

A comprehensive router designed to guide researchers through the entire lifecycle of writing a highly rigorous academic paper for top-tier econometrics journals, such as Econometrica. It outlines the necessary steps—from initial topic selection and theoretical positioning to detailed identification checks, robustness testing, and final submission package assembly—ensuring the manuscript meets the highest standards of mathematical rigor and scholarly depth. This guide does not replace specialized skills but dictates the optimal sequence of research stages.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers targeting Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) submissions. It provides detailed heuristics on journal positioning, scope fit, required mechanistic rigor, data presentation standards, and structural elements. Use this checklist to re-frame and strengthen your manuscript before submission, ensuring alignment with the journal's high standards in environmental chemistry, green engineering, and environmental science.

A specialized skill designed to guide the creation of high-quality, structured abstracts for top-tier academic journals, particularly adhering to the standards of the Economic Research Journal (ERJ). It provides detailed templates for the five-sentence Chinese summary and the five-element English summary, ensuring academic rigor, quantifiable results, and avoiding common, empty filler phrases.

This comprehensive guide provides a detailed preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to top-tier journals. It covers crucial guidelines such as implementing double-blind anonymization, adhering to specific author rules (co-authorship, affiliations), structuring the abstract, and mastering the Author-Date citation style. Use this guide to ensure your submission meets all official academic standards and maximizes acceptance chances.

This guide outlines the specific writing standards required for high-impact academic manuscripts in finance. It teaches authors how to structure their work to ensure the finding and its practical, managerial, or market implication ('the so-what') are immediately clear to a general finance audience, rather than being buried in technical jargon or methodology. Focus areas include finding-first abstracts and compelling first-page hooks.

A comprehensive audit checklist and guide for authors submitting academic papers to top-tier conferences like FOCS. It covers critical aspects including formatting standards (11pt, single-column), metadata integrity (double-blind checks), technical pre-flight checks (unencrypted PDF, no author leakage), and adherence to complex publication policies (IEEE/SIGACT). Essential for ensuring submission readiness.

This guide details the unique and transparent submission process for Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It clearly explains the roles of the publicly known Editor-in-Charge, anonymous Advisory Editors, and referees, describing the 'single-anonymized' review model. It helps authors set realistic expectations regarding the high standards, low acceptance odds (~15% published), and critical points for improving their manuscripts before submission.

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-caliber academic journals like Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It ensures compliance with critical publishing standards, covering abstract length limits (≤250 words), mandatory conference-version disclosures, generative AI declarations, and correct formatting (LaTeX/Word elsarticle). Use this checklist before submitting to Editorial Manager to minimize rejection risks.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors on situating their manuscripts within the comparative governance, public policy, and public administration literatures. It teaches the methodology of building a strong, portable, and theoretically comparative argument, ensuring the research contribution is relevant to the international scholarly community and meets high academic standards.

This guide details the rigorous peer-review process for top-tier academic journals, focusing specifically on identifying scope fit, managing double-blind anonymity, and satisfying comparative-institutional contribution requirements. Use this before submission to pre-empt common rejection pitfalls and structure your manuscript for maximum impact.