Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for drafting or revising literature reviews for high-level economic journals. It teaches the optimal 'dialogue-based' structure, balancing theoretical depth (theory vs. empirical), managing Chinese/English citation ratios, and clearly articulating the paper's unique contribution and scholarly gap.

A comprehensive guide for authors on crafting the policy implications section for academic economics manuscripts. It distinguishes between operational policy advice (like government memos) and the theoretical, institutional significance required by top-tier journals. Learn the structured approach, the 'evidence-to-meaning' deduction chain, and how to elevate findings to macro/principle levels.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer review and editorial board reports for top-tier academic journals. It covers the correct revision sequencing (manuscript first, then letter), structures for point-by-point replies, strategies for accepting, partially accepting, or rebutting reviewer comments, and deciding the optimal placement of supplementary analysis (body vs. appendix).

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers preparing manuscripts for top-tier Chinese economic journals. It teaches users how to structure complex research topics by rigorously checking four dimensions: theoretical contribution, marginal differences, mechanism revelation, and unique Chinese context. Essential for elevating a raw idea into a publishable, high-impact paper.

This guide provides a structured strategy for authors responding to major academic revisions, particularly in environmental science. It teaches how to transform reviewer critiques—such as demands for QA/QC, mass balances, or new controls—into evidence-based responses. The key is to structure the letter, address every point concretely, and defend the scientific contribution while maintaining clarity and professionalism for the editor.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure and submit highly technical papers to major academic conferences (e.g., EuroSys). It outlines the 'four shelves'—the 12-page core argument, references, artifact repositories, and appendices—ensuring that the main, decision-critical evidence is always contained within the primary reviewed pages, preventing the submission from failing due to overflow.

A comprehensive guide for authors to sharpen the marginal contribution of their Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscripts. It moves beyond simple topic novelty by outlining a structured ladder of contribution (e.g., confound removal, new decisive treatment) and teaching authors how to precisely map their design against canonical behavioral paradigms and prior work. Essential for improving academic rigor and manuscript acceptance rates.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to revise-and-resubmit reports in Experimental Economics (ExpEcon). It details how to triage complex reviewer comments, plan for necessary new data collection (new treatments, more sessions), address critical methodological concerns like deception or power deficits, and structure a highly persuasive, point-by-point response letter.

This guide assists researchers in drafting a highly structured and scope-specific cover letter for journal submissions, particularly targeting publications like Field Crops Research. It emphasizes establishing clear scope fit (field-based, multi-environment), articulating the novel quantitative contribution, and confirming essential submission declarations (originality, data availability). Using this skill ensures the letter meets the stringent requirements necessary to pass the initial editor scope check and improve acceptance rates.

This guide details how to elevate localized or descriptive agricultural findings into general scientific contributions suitable for high-impact journals. It teaches authors how to identify unresolved biophysical gaps, connect results to broad crop-yield mechanisms, and structure their introduction to prove general relevance rather than merely reporting local data.

This skill provides a deep dive into the rigorous multi-stage review process for scientific manuscripts, particularly in field crops. It details editor scope screening, the single-anonymized expert review, and the specific criteria required (e.g., multi-environment data, statistical rigor, general relevance) to prevent desk rejection. Use this knowledge before submission to stress-test your manuscript, anticipate reviewer objections, and structure your findings for maximum scientific impact.

This guide provides a detailed playbook for responding to major or minor revisions of scientific manuscripts, particularly in agronomy and crop science. It teaches authors how to structure the rebuttal letter, systematically address specific reviewer concerns (e.g., scope, statistics, reproducibility), and professionally reconcile conflicting feedback while protecting the core scientific contribution to facilitate publication acceptance.