Skill UI

Utilizes structured critical reasoning to rigorously stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions. This skill allows you to play devil's advocate, conduct pre-mortems, execute red-teaming exercises, or audit underlying assumptions. It employs multiple advanced modes, including Socratic questioning, Hegelian dialectics, and Falsificationism, to identify blind spots, weaknesses, and unstated assumptions before commitment.

This skill implements a file-based planning system (Manus style) for managing complex, multi-step projects. It uses persistent Markdown files—including `task_plan.md`, `progress.md`, and `findings.md`—as structured, disk-based working memory. It is ideal for maintaining context, conducting detailed project analysis, tracking progress across long sessions, and ensuring continuity even after interruptions.

A structured system designed to extract the cognitive fingerprint of any text's author. Utilizing the DHDNA framework, it analyzes 12 dimensions—such as Analytical Depth, Emotional Processing, and Strategic Thinking—to provide deep insights into the author's unique reasoning patterns, decision-making style, and overall cognitive signature. Ideal for content analysis, psychological profiling, and understanding underlying thought processes.

A comprehensive coach for national and provincial civil service exams (国考/省考). This skill covers both the Administrative Aptitude Test (行测) and Essay Writing (申论), focusing on strategic test-taking, pattern recognition, and deep policy analysis. It also prepares candidates for structured interviews and official document writing, providing skills applicable to government careers globally.

A multi-phase workflow designed to guide users through complex problem analysis and solution design. Instead of providing immediate answers, it systematically enforces deep thinking by reviewing the problem's validity, assessing information gaps, performing root cause analysis, and iterating through solution vetting (self-check and final review). Ideal for complex technical troubleshooting, decision-making, or theoretical discussions requiring rigorous methodology.

This mode acts as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through ambiguous problems, complex decisions, and open-ended strategy questions. Instead of providing direct answers, it focuses on challenging assumptions, asking clarifying questions, surfacing multiple perspectives (e.g., stakeholder views), and helping the user structure their thought process using advanced techniques like reframing, pre-mortem analysis, and identifying critical constraints. Ideal for product managers and leaders who need to explore ideas without a clear path forward.

This specialized skill guides the creation of long-form structural critical essays and detailed academic dossiers, primarily for Chinese academic contexts. It utilizes the CrossFrame methodology to first establish a foundational structure, define evidence boundaries, and identify key mechanisms, before applying a critical matrix. The output is highly structured, ensuring depth, rigorous source checking, and comprehensive critical analysis suitable for complex intellectual work.

This skill is designed for generating structured, insightful, and boundary-aware short answers, such as reader replies, editor responses, or consultation advice. It structures analysis by defining fact boundaries, providing structural judgment, offering necessary critique, and suggesting safe, low-risk next steps. It is primarily activated by the CrossFrame Suite, ensuring the output maintains a canonical Chinese semantic layer while providing professional, actionable advice.

This skill facilitates the design of comprehensive employee engagement surveys (e.g., annual, pulse, exit) and provides a structured framework for analyzing the results. It guides users through creating key sections like eNPS, culture metrics, and growth opportunities, culminating in actionable plans and communication templates for HR professionals.

This skill generates highly structured legal documents, including memos, case summaries, and argument outlines. It utilizes the standard IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) to provide comprehensive legal analysis. Ideal for drafting position papers, legal advice summaries, or preparatory documents for court submissions, ensuring all legal arguments are systematically presented and uncertainties are explicitly flagged.

A comprehensive guide for authors facing a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) status in academic journals. It outlines the entire revision lifecycle, from building a structured response matrix and performing substantive re-analysis (re-coding, new experiments) to strategically drafting the point-by-point rebuttal letter. Focuses on maintaining academic rigor, reconciling conflicting reviews, and ensuring methodological consistency before final resubmission.

This guide helps authors structure, refine, and polish academic manuscripts for Comparative Political Studies (CPS) journals. It ensures the prose is tightly focused, the argument is stated clearly from the start, and the paper adheres to the specific house formatting (e.g., 11,000-word limit, unstructured abstract, APA style). It improves readability and structure without altering the core analysis.