Skill UI

This skill facilitates the design of comprehensive employee engagement surveys (e.g., annual, pulse, exit) and provides a structured framework for analyzing the results. It guides users through creating key sections like eNPS, culture metrics, and growth opportunities, culminating in actionable plans and communication templates for HR professionals.

This guide provides comprehensive methodological blueprints for designing scholarly manuscripts submitted to Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS). It covers various research paradigms, including qualitative field studies, behavioral experiments, surveys, and historical/archival inquiries. Emphasis is placed on rigorous planning, ethical considerations (IRB approval, consent, anonymity), and maintaining theoretical alignment between the research design and the core argument, helping researchers avoid methodological pitfalls.

This guide provides structured criteria for selecting high-quality, publishable topics for academic law review submissions, such as the Harvard Law Review. It emphasizes that successful topics must possess broad legal significance, be timely (linked to recent legal developments), and contain a clear normative argument, moving beyond mere descriptive surveys.

A comprehensive guide for transforming descriptive academic material into a sharp, contestable, and thesis-driven argument. This skill helps scholars structure their research papers, moving beyond mere surveys or descriptions to make claims that can be disputed and defended with evidence and rigorous method, suitable for high-level scholarly journals.

This framework guides the creation of a structured, argumentative literature review, preventing the writing from becoming a mere annotated bibliography. By imposing a unifying taxonomy, model, or question sequence, the author transforms scattered research into a cohesive argument about the field. It helps define the 'spine' of the survey, identifies knowledge gaps, and reconciles apparent contradictions in existing literature.

A detailed guide for authors submitting to the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA). It teaches how to precisely position a quantitative finance paper against the existing academic literature, moving beyond simple surveys to define a sharp, unique contribution gap for reviewers. Focuses on structuring the argument using a 'three-paragraph compression' method.

This guide teaches required skills for positioning mathematical finance research papers. It instructs authors on how to structure the literature review to clearly demonstrate methodological novelty by comparing their theorem precisely against existing results in stochastic analysis, pricing, and control theory. Focus must be on theorem-level contribution, not merely topic surveys.