Skill UI

Utilizes structured critical reasoning to rigorously stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions. This skill allows you to play devil's advocate, conduct pre-mortems, execute red-teaming exercises, or audit underlying assumptions. It employs multiple advanced modes, including Socratic questioning, Hegelian dialectics, and Falsificationism, to identify blind spots, weaknesses, and unstated assumptions before commitment.

Explains the altitude-and-horizon mental model that differentiates PM and Director thinking, helping leaders diagnose friction zones, create cascading context, and focus on system-level strategy when scope or direction is unclear.

Satori is a sophisticated AI wisdom companion that merges advanced clinical psychology frameworks (such as IFS, DBT, and Schema Therapy) with diverse philosophical traditions (like Stoicism, Jungian depth psychology, and Buddhism). It functions as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through deep self-exploration, internal conflicts, and existential questions to foster profound personal insight.

This tutor specializes in developing advanced critical thinking and argumentative skills across humanities and social sciences. It covers disciplines including philosophy, sociology, psychology, political science, and literature. Instead of providing simple answers, the focus is on teaching students how to construct nuanced, evidence-based arguments, utilize multiple theoretical frameworks (e.g., Marxist, feminist), engage in close textual reading, and master the structure of academic writing, supporting both Chinese and Western academic traditions.

A comprehensive mentor for graduate students and early-career researchers, guiding the entire research lifecycle. This skill covers formulating rigorous research questions, designing studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), conducting literature reviews, analyzing data, and writing publishable papers. It emphasizes methodological rigor, critical thinking, and ethical considerations.

This skill transforms the AI into a coach for rigorous, systematic thinking. It helps users analyze arguments, detect logical fallacies (like ad hominem or false dilemma), recognize cognitive biases, and evaluate the credibility of evidence and sources. It provides a framework for developing deep reasoning skills necessary for navigating misinformation and complex real-world issues.

Simulates a multi-perspective council of thinking archetypes to analyze decisions, research trade-offs, and creative challenges. Separates evidence from assumptions and values, then synthesizes a conditional recommendation with open questions.

A comprehensive academic tutor designed for K-12 students, covering history, geography, civics, and social studies across global curricula (including US, European, and Chinese systems). This skill moves beyond rote memorization, employing historical thinking skills—such as sourcing, contextualization, and corroboration—to help students analyze primary sources, understand causation, and connect past events to modern-day issues. It develops critical thinking and spatial reasoning through inquiry-based learning and structured debate.

A multi-phase workflow designed to guide users through complex problem analysis and solution design. Instead of providing immediate answers, it systematically enforces deep thinking by reviewing the problem's validity, assessing information gaps, performing root cause analysis, and iterating through solution vetting (self-check and final review). Ideal for complex technical troubleshooting, decision-making, or theoretical discussions requiring rigorous methodology.

This mode acts as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through ambiguous problems, complex decisions, and open-ended strategy questions. Instead of providing direct answers, it focuses on challenging assumptions, asking clarifying questions, surfacing multiple perspectives (e.g., stakeholder views), and helping the user structure their thought process using advanced techniques like reframing, pre-mortem analysis, and identifying critical constraints. Ideal for product managers and leaders who need to explore ideas without a clear path forward.

This agent provides a critical framework for navigating corporate environments, contrasting internal jargon and process visibility (Ding In) with objective, real-world evidence and user experience (Ding Out). It helps users move beyond subjective 'feelings' or polished reports, structuring complex tasks into verifiable components: Goal, Acceptance Criteria, Action, Evidence, and Risk. Ideal for project management, status reporting, and critical thinking in a corporate setting.

A rigorous framework to prevent confident fabrication (hallucination) by treating competence as an evidence boundary. It guides users to classify claims—Grounded, Partial, or Ungrounded—based on verifiable sources. It mandates assessing the cost of wrongness before answering, fetching, or abstaining, ensuring that assertions are always backed by sufficient evidence.