Skill UI

This guide details the multi-stage, rigorous review process for the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS). It covers the mechanics of double-blind screening, editorial fit assessment, expert peer review, and the unique, critical post-acceptance third-party verification step. It is designed to help authors anticipate and mitigate potential rejection issues by structuring and refining their manuscripts to meet top-tier academic standards.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed specifically for submitting articles to the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) via Editorial Manager. It covers critical, highly specific steps for double-blind review, including separating the cover page, adhering to the AJS house style (not ASA), ensuring required alt text for figures, crafting the ~150-word abstract, and managing the submission fee. Use this guide before final upload to avoid common rejection errors.

This skill serves as the central workflow router for manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Sociology (AJS). It guides authors through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and theoretical framing to research design, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It helps authors determine the appropriate next step based on the manuscript type (research article, comment, reply) and current stage, ensuring the work meets AJS's high standard for theoretical ambition and sociological dialogue.

A comprehensive guide for conducting rigorous academic literature reviews. It teaches authors how to critically appraise and synthesize conflicting empirical evidence by weighing findings based on credibility, study design, and contextual differences. The framework ensures balance, maintains objectivity, and elevates the quality of academic scholarship.

This guide teaches researchers how to construct credible, high-impact synthesis exhibits for academic reviews (e.g., Academy of Management Annals). It focuses on creating framework figures, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and coverage exhibits that summarize existing literature, rather than presenting new primary data estimates. Essential for systematically structuring and communicating complex knowledge fields.

This comprehensive framework guides researchers on assessing the suitability of a candidate literature topic for a high-impact, integrative academic review (e.g., Annals). It requires the topic to pass five critical criteria—Maturity, Importance, Fragmentation, Integrability, and Tractable Scope—ensuring the resulting review addresses a profound 'problem with the field' and proposes a forward-looking agenda, rather than just summarizing existing knowledge.

This sophisticated workflow orchestrator is designed for authors submitting manuscripts to *American Anthropologist*. It acts as a guide, routing the user through the necessary stages—from initial idea selection and literature positioning to theory building and ethical review. It ensures the final work maintains a required anthropological breadth, integrating reflexivity and ethics of care throughout the writing process.

This guide helps researchers structure their discussion section and manuscript to explicitly articulate the theoretical contribution, moving beyond simple results reporting. It teaches how to identify, claim, and frame various types of theoretical advancements (e.g., new mechanisms, boundaries, or integrating literatures), ensuring the paper meets the high standards of top-tier academic journals like AMJ.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) editorial and peer-review process. It details the stages from desk review to final decision letter interpretation. Users learn how to distinguish between fatal and fixable concerns, prioritize the action editor's feedback, and strategically plan deep, multi-round revisions, turning feedback into actionable research improvements.

This tool provides comprehensive, late-stage polish for full-manuscript academic prose, specifically tailored for top-tier journals (e.g., AMJ). It focuses on transforming dense, jargon-heavy text into rigorous yet highly readable narratives. Key functions include front-loading the core argument, enforcing active voice, refining structural flow (Introduction to Discussion arc), ensuring consistent terminology, and adhering strictly to required academic house styles and formatting standards. It improves clarity and rhetorical impact without altering the theoretical contribution or data analy...

A comprehensive guide for academics on articulating the true theoretical novelty of a manuscript. It teaches authors how to rigorously answer 'What is new?' and 'So what?' by clearly differentiating their work from prior literature, ensuring the contribution is a genuine conceptual leap, not merely a relabeling or minor extension.

This skill guides the stress-testing of theoretical manuscripts by focusing purely on logical coherence. It helps authors develop robust arguments by verifying proposition chains, running counterfactual thought experiments, addressing rival theories, and identifying disconfirming cases. It ensures the internal consistency and rigor of a theory, independent of empirical data analysis.