Skill UI

This skill enhances AI responses by simulating the inner monologue and self-correction process of a human being. It moves beyond standard helpful assistance by incorporating three stages: Self (raw instinct), Mirror (critical reflection), and Conscious Response (the polished, human-like output). Ideal for emotional support, personal advice, or writing that requires authentic emotional depth and a distinct point of view, rather than purely factual or structured data.

This skill acts as a global LinkedIn strategist, helping professionals transform basic CVs and profiles into top 1% authority accounts. It performs deep audits on headlines, 'About' sections, and experience, enhancing SEO, solving brand confusion, and providing actionable strategies for career and business growth.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for integrating with the Workhuman Social Recognition and rewards API. It covers vital HR concepts, including OAuth 2.0 authentication, peer-to-peer nomination workflows, configurable award levels (bronze, silver, gold), and crucial bidirectional synchronization with major HRIS systems like Workday and SAP SuccessFactors. Use this skill to build sophisticated, automated employee recognition and reward management systems in an enterprise environment.

This skill serves as the central entry point for comprehensive API security testing. It guides testers to systematically categorize and prioritize potential vulnerabilities by focusing on core dimensions such as documentation review (Recon), object-level authorization (BOLA), token integrity (JWT), and complex data structures (GraphQL/Hidden Params). Use this as the initial step when assessing a new REST or GraphQL endpoint.

This tool generates a comprehensive, structured, five-section academic paper outline (Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion) based on a provided research topic, preference brief, and source references. It ensures the outline contains sufficient substance and integrates multiple citation keys, serving as a robust foundation for a full-length research paper.

This guide details how to position academic manuscripts within a specific geographic scholarly debate, rather than simply citing domain literature. It teaches authors to identify the "closest prior account," articulate a cross-cutting geographic stake, and engage with core geographic theories to enhance the impact of their findings for an advanced scholarly audience.

A comprehensive guide detailing the process of responding to major or minor revisions from academic journals (like AAAG). It teaches authors how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, address editor and referee concerns methodically, strengthen the core academic argument, and incorporate required methodological and cartographic fixes, ensuring the response is both respectful and scientifically rigorous.

This guide teaches researchers how to rigorously assess a topic's geographic significance and determine its optimal fit within the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). It implements a two-part fit test—ensuring the argument is fundamentally geographic (space/place/scale are load-bearing) and possesses sufficient reach to interest neighboring subfields. It guides authors in choosing the correct area (e.g., Human, Physical, Methods) and appropriate journal venue (Annals vs. specialty). Use this when defining a project scope, overcoming reviewer critiques, or deciding wher...

This guide assists in polishing and formatting academic manuscripts for high-level geographical journals. It ensures adherence to specific academic standards, such as the Chicago Manual of Style (author-date), managing strict word count caps, and structuring the argument to be legible to a broad, interdisciplinary audience. It focuses on elevating prose from subfield jargon to broadly readable academic discourse.

Draft concise AAAI author responses (rebuttals) under strict character limits, no-URL rules, and no-new-results guidance. Prioritize decision-critical factual corrections, handle AI-generated reviews, and optimize limited space to influence SPC/AC discussions.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning an accepted, anonymous conference submission into the final, public camera-ready version for publication. It covers de-anonymization steps, including restoring author details, updating proceedings metadata, reflowing figures for multiagent papers, and integrating rebuttal promises without expanding the core contribution. This ensures adherence to strict publishing standards.

A comprehensive guide on writing literature reviews and related work sections, specifically tailored for high-impact journals like Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It teaches authors how to frame their research by focusing on the incremental contribution (delta), moving beyond simple literature listing to establish clear gaps, contrasting current limitations, and rigorously defining the work's novelty in a structured manner.