Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors on structuring and writing manuscripts for high-impact journals. It advises on selecting the correct format (Report vs. Research Article), maintaining strict word and figure budgets, organizing results by logical argument flow, and strategically moving detailed methods to supplementary materials to ensure the main narrative remains concise and powerful.

This comprehensive guide outlines the scope, required evidence, and structural standards for submitting mechanistic immunology research to Science Immunology (Sci Immunol). It details how to position studies with translational relevance, emphasizing the combination of human clinical data with in vivo mouse models. It serves as a critical tool for authors to assess the manuscript's fit, adherence to AAAS standards, and overall scientific rigor before submission.

This specialized skill guides users in assessing whether their Chinese R&D or innovation management manuscript is suitable for submission to the journal Science Research Management. It helps users understand the journal's specific scope, required structure, key evidence types, and common rejection pitfalls, ensuring the work is properly framed for academic publication.

Provides a structured methodology for authors preparing a technical resubmission response, particularly for systems-level research. It emphasizes treating reviewer feedback as a contractual list of required changes, necessitating new measurements and concrete evidence rather than mere arguments. Users learn to create a critical 'change-map,' prioritize blocking concerns, and maintain professional anonymity during the resubmission process.

This guide outlines the critical, irreversible steps for preparing a camera-ready version of a submitted academic paper for a major conference. It covers de-anonymizing the content, securing ACM rights and metadata, correctly integrating artifact badges and reproducibility details, and structuring the final presentation talk for a merged expert audience.

A guide on how to position a research contribution for general social science journals. It emphasizes moving beyond simple literature reviews to actively engaging a live academic debate. Users learn how to connect niche findings to broader social science implications while maintaining scholarly rigor and adhering to strict word and citation limits.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for responding to a Revise-and-Resubmit (R&R) decision, particularly for Social Forces submissions. It teaches users how to systematically address every reviewer comment, reconcile conflicting demands, and maintain methodological rigor while strictly adhering to tight word and panel limits.

This guide provides a comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to specialized journals (e.g., Social Forces via ScholarOne). It details critical compliance points such as double-anonymization, adherence to the 10,000-word limit (including references), panel count limits, and mandatory style requirements (Chicago 17th). It is designed to help authors catch common formatting and anonymity failures before official submission.

This skill guides the transformation of empirical findings into generalizable, theoretically robust arguments suitable for top-tier social science publishing. It helps define core social mechanisms, establish scope conditions, and derive testable observable implications across diverse methodologies (e.g., quantitative, comparative, network). Use this when your initial results are strong but the overarching theoretical contribution needs explicit articulation.

This guide outlines the strict writing and formatting requirements for submitting scholarly manuscripts to a general social science audience. Key guidelines include adopting the Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed., author-date), maintaining an accessible, argument-first prose, and adhering to a stringent total word count cap that includes all references. It ensures academic submissions are professional, readable, and properly formatted for publication.

A comprehensive guide for authors considering submission to SIAM Review. This skill evaluates whether a manuscript fits the journal's expository, broad-readership mandate for applied and computational mathematics. It outlines requirements for different sections (e.g., Survey, Research Spotlights), covering accessibility, technical rigor, structure, and official submission checklists.

This guide details the comprehensive steps required after an ACM conference paper has been accepted. It covers critical stages including obtaining shepherd approval, de-anonymizing the work (restoring author names, funding, and system details), reflowing the paper using the acmart template, and submitting both the source code and the final PDF through the ACM Publishing System (TAPS). It emphasizes releasing public artifacts for reproducibility.