Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors on structuring professional and scientifically sound rebuttals to major journal peer reviews (e.g., JEEM). It teaches how to triage demanding feedback, address core methodological critiques (spatial confounding, leakage, valuation bias), and maintain a collegial, evidence-based tone to strengthen the manuscript.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major revisions on highly selective, cross-disciplinary journals (like JEG). It teaches how to structure a rebuttal letter that successfully addresses conflicting feedback from referees—balancing econometric rigor with regional geographic context—ensuring the core contribution remains intact.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to cross-disciplinary journals (e.g., Economics and Geography). It details how to anticipate and pre-emptively address systematic objections from two distinct scholarly communities, ensuring the paper satisfies both rigorous quantitative methods and deep spatial theory. Use this when your work bridges two fields and needs to survive double-anonymous review.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to revise-and-resubmit (R&R) decisions from highly selective journals. It teaches a rigorous strategy for addressing referee concerns regarding proof gaps, assumptions, generality, and exposition, ensuring the response is structured, evidence-based, and highly professional.

This guide provides a deep analysis of the rigorous, multi-stage evaluation process for top-tier economic theory journals, specifically detailing the Journal of Economic Theory (JET) standards. It covers the desk-screening phase, single-blind refereeing requirements (minimum two reviewers), and editor decision-making. Use this to structure your proofs, maximize theoretical contribution, and preemptively address common academic objections.

This guide provides a structured framework for authors responding to reviewers' feedback for top-tier academic journals, especially in finance or economics. It emphasizes addressing methodological concerns (identification, causality, mechanisms) point-by-point, ensuring every response is backed by new evidence, and precisely locating changes in the revised manuscript.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and drafting response letters when facing major revisions or rejection (R&R) from top-tier academic journals, such as JHE. Teaches how to triage reviewer comments, address design credibility concerns, reconcile conflicting opinions, and present new evidence (estimates and bounds) in a professional, non-defensive manner.

This style guide helps authors structure and write manuscripts for health economics journals, specifically addressing the unique needs of specialist reviewers. It focuses on ensuring the policy relevance, the empirical contribution, and the institutional grounding of the research are immediately clear, particularly in the abstract and introduction.

A comprehensive guide for crafting structured and highly technical response letters to academic reviewers, specifically modeled after top-tier economics journals (e.g., JIE). It teaches the precise format for addressing both editorial concerns and complex referee points, covering specialized econometrics and structural modeling fixes for international trade and open-economy macroeconomics.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of International Economics (JIE). It details the various submission types (regular, short, PRP), the stages of editorial handling (desk screen, referee rounds), historical acceptance odds, and best practices for maximizing manuscript chances of acceptance in top-tier economics journals.

A comprehensive guide for managing the highly critical stage of journal revision. This skill helps researchers decode editor feedback, strategically decide on necessary data collection (e.g., new countries, invariance tests), and structure a professional, point-by-point response letter that addresses every reviewer comment effectively while maintaining scholarly rigor.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major/minor revisions, reject-and-resubmits, or transfer offers from top-tier international finance journals (JIMF). It teaches the structured, evidence-based approach necessary to address reviewer critiques, reconcile conflicting feedback, and successfully advocate for revised methodology.