Skill UI

This skill guides the transformation of quantitative research findings (models, experiments, empirical results) into structured, actionable managerial insights. It enforces the 'Condition-Decision-Effect' framework, ensuring that every policy suggestion is directly traceable to specific data points, parameters, or experimental findings. Essential for authors aiming to publish high-impact academic papers in management science.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to reviewer critiques during a Revise and Resubmit cycle. It covers project management of complex revisions, strategic triage of feedback (Do, Decline, Cannot), structuring the point-by-point response letter, and maintaining a professional, collegial tone to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive project management guide for navigating the IEEE INFOCOM conference submission cycle. This skill outlines every critical milestone, from initial topic selection and abstract registration through full-paper submission, camera-ready preparation, and final presentation. It emphasizes backward planning around the single annual summer deadline and highlights key risk areas for success.

This skill guides authors through the crucial decision of selecting the correct JACS format (Article or Communication). It provides detailed strategies for rightsizing the manuscript, determining what essential evidence belongs in the main text, and what detailed data should be moved to the Supplementary Information (SI), ensuring compliance with rigorous journal norms.

This guide helps researchers evaluate the core mechanism of their academic paper, determining whether the focus is fundamentally on financial mechanisms. It provides criteria for positioning the work along the macro-finance or micro-corporate finance line, and offers advice on suggesting alternative journals if the topic drifts into general industrial, accounting, or management fields.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the discussion section of academic manuscripts, particularly for top-tier journals. It teaches researchers how to move beyond merely reporting findings to explicitly defining the theoretical advance—such as revealing a new mechanism, establishing a boundary condition, or integrating rival theories—thereby ensuring the paper contributes meaningfully to the academic field.

This guide helps academic researchers scope their research questions and determine the appropriate contribution type (empirical paper, meta-analysis, or systematic review) for top-tier general management journals. It teaches authors how to ensure their work has a broad, general-management theoretical contribution rather than being too niche, and how to strategically compare fit against competing academic journals.

This skill guides the polishing of academic manuscripts for top-tier journals, such as the Journal of Management (JOM). It focuses on structural integrity, ensuring the introduction follows a theory-forward arc (Hook → Gap → Contribution), adhering to strict portal guidelines (e.g., 250-word abstract, 15-word title, 50-page limit), and maintaining professional APA 7th voice. Use this when the prose or structure is the bottleneck, requiring refinement rather than conceptual contribution.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier academic journals, particularly the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). It instructs authors on how to translate empirical or analytical results into a clear, dual-payload contribution that advances the technology–organization–economics nexus, ensuring the finding has both theoretical depth and practical manager relevance.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting to top-tier IS journals (e.g., JMIS). It teaches authors how to effectively reposition their work, ensuring the contribution advances a specific IS-management/economics conversation rather than being viewed as a mere technical finding from a reference discipline. Learn to frame the scholarly gap as a tension or contradiction, name the specific academic stream, and engage with the core IS literature.

A comprehensive guide for developing and defending research methodologies for top-tier academic journals, such as the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). It details how to properly design studies—whether they involve econometrics, behavioral experiments, or design-science artifacts—to establish credible causal identification and meet scholarly rigor, while adhering to strict manuscript length limits.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS). This guide details crucial steps for successful submission, including full double-blind anonymization techniques, specific formatting rules (≤50 pages, ≤150-word abstract), numbered referencing style, and the unique EIC email intake process. It ensures the manuscript package meets all requirements for initial double-blind review.