Skill UI

A comprehensive workflow for preparing and maintaining grounded, venue-compliant rebuttals to external academic reviews. It handles strict text-only character limits, manages responses for multiple reviewers (e.g., OpenReview style), supports follow-up rounds, and enforces safety gates against fabrication or overpromising. Ideal for the post-submission phase of research publishing.

Utilizes Grammarly's advanced APIs to conduct comprehensive content auditing. This skill detects the likelihood of AI-generated content and checks the provided text against vast databases for plagiarism. It provides a combined score assessing overall writing quality, clarity, and academic integrity, making it essential for professional, academic, and published content review.

This skill provides comprehensive capabilities for working with Microsoft Word documents (.docx). It supports full document lifecycle management, including text extraction (via pandoc), raw XML manipulation, creating new documents, and complex editing. Specialized workflows are available for redlining, handling tracked changes, managing comments, and preserving intricate formatting, making it ideal for professional, academic, and business document processing.

This skill acts as a literature-research assistant, orchestrating a Python CLI to interface with APIs like Semantic Scholar and arXiv. It enables users to search for academic papers by topic, retrieve detailed metadata, perform impact analysis using citation tracking, download PDFs, and extract text content. It streamlines the entire academic research workflow from initial discovery to deep reading.

This workflow transforms long YouTube talks and lectures into a personal, structured, and local markdown library. Each video becomes a self-contained file containing slide snapshots, full timestamped transcripts, and editable study notes. It eliminates reliance on cloud services, giving users full ownership of their academic material.

This tool serves as an orchestrator for manuscripts submitted to the Annals of the AAG. It guides authors through the complex submission process by helping define the appropriate academic area (e.g., Human Geography, Physical Geography), the article format (Article, Commentary), and the sequential developmental stages—from topic selection and theory building to data analysis and final submission. It ensures the work is framed legitimately as *geography*.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers to the AAMAS conference. It details all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, abstract submission, double-blind review, rebuttal, and final camera-ready preparation. Essential for managing complex research involving game theory and multi-agent systems.

This comprehensive guide structures the entire academic publishing journey for Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It breaks down the process from initial topic selection and writing to double-blind review, multi-round revisions, and final publication. It outlines critical milestones, stage gates, and potential pitfalls to help authors manage the complex timeline and ensure a professional, structured submission.

A comprehensive workflow router designed for authors submitting manuscripts to the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied). This skill guides the user through every stage of the academic writing process—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to causal identification, robustness checks, polishing, data replication package preparation, and final submission/rebuttal. It acts as a navigational guide, ensuring all critical steps required by top-tier economics journals are addressed in the correct sequence.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts intended for the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ). It guides users through the entire writing lifecycle, determining the correct next step based on the current development stage and the paper's dominant education-research lens (e.g., policy, teaching, development). It is designed to ensure the contribution is pitched to the whole field, not just a subfield.

This skill acts as the primary orchestrator for any American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript. It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, determining the next necessary step based on the project stage. From developing a significant historical question and gathering primary sources to structuring the argument, refining prose, and managing citations, it ensures the focus remains on deep historiographical evidence and interpretation.

A comprehensive project management guide for the entire academic lifecycle of submitting a paper to a top-tier conference like AISTATS. It maps all crucial milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence freezing to abstract submission, review discussion, and final camera-ready publication—providing backward-planning heuristics and risk assessment to ensure timely and high-quality submissions.