Skill UI

Launches a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) speed reader. This tool displays text one word at a time, using ORP (Optimal Recognition Point) highlighting, which is designed to enhance comprehension and reading pacing. It is ideal for users who need a quick, focused reading aid for large blocks of text, such as prior conversation responses or provided arguments, rather than requiring document summary or formatting transformation.

This skill allows users to search, fetch detailed metadata, download, and summarize academic papers from the arXiv repository. It supports searching by keywords or specific arXiv IDs and provides robust arguments for controlling the results count, output directory, and download scope. Ideal for students, researchers, and anyone requiring scholarly literature.

Command-line helper in the gws toolkit that fetches values from a specified Google Sheets spreadsheet via spreadsheet ID and range arguments, keeping the interaction strictly read-only for reporting or automation tasks.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the complex process of revising manuscripts after receiving multiple, demanding expert reports (R&R). It outlines strategic approaches for structuring the response letter, handling conflicting reviewer demands, and rigorously protecting the core historical argument while maintaining academic anonymity.

This skill acts as the primary orchestrator for any American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript. It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, determining the next necessary step based on the project stage. From developing a significant historical question and gathering primary sources to structuring the argument, refining prose, and managing citations, it ensures the focus remains on deep historiographical evidence and interpretation.

This skill is designed to polish and refine academic manuscripts intended for the American Historical Review (AHR). It focuses on enhancing the clarity, narrative flow, and authoritative voice of the prose, ensuring the work is accessible and engaging for historians across all subfields. It tightens the overall readability, minimizes unnecessary jargon, and helps frame evidence without altering the core arguments or academic content.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for refining academic prose specifically for major psychology review publications. It teaches authors how to achieve an authoritative yet accessible voice, shifting the focus from merely listing studies to constructing a deep, argumentative narrative (the 'spine'). It is crucial for structuring abstracts, introductions, and future-directions sections to engage both specialists and general psychology readers.

This comprehensive orchestrator guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It is designed to ensure that the paper maintains a genuinely comparative argument—across countries, regions, or time—at every stage, routing the user to the correct next skill (e.g., theory building, research design, data analysis). It does not generate content; it directs the scholarly workflow.

A comprehensive guide on structuring responses to peer reviews for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., DAC, ICCAD). It provides strategies for writing rebuttals, transforming reviews into actionable fixes, and adapting the response style for both conference resubmission and journal formats, emphasizing evidence over argument.

This skill is a comprehensive routing guide for scholarly manuscripts in the humanities. It assists users by classifying submissions based on sub-field (e.g., history, philosophy, literature), contribution type (argument, theory, interpretation), and methodological approach. It helps determine the optimal target journal among various specialized and generalist venues, ensuring the manuscript is correctly framed for scholarly review and fit.

This guide provides strict stylistic and structural guidelines for drafting scientific manuscripts intended for Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL). It focuses on transforming regional descriptions into process-focused arguments, managing word count, and ensuring clarity for a highly cross-disciplinary scientific readership.

A comprehensive guide to navigating the intensive, multi-round post-acceptance editing cycle for academic journals. It outlines the distinct stages—from substantive argument strengthening to technical line edits and final Bluebook proofing—ensuring submissions stay on track through the required rounds and into print.