Skill UI

This comprehensive workflow router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of preparing a manuscript for the European Economic Review (EER). It systematically diagnoses bottlenecks and maps the optimal sequence of specialized skills—from refining the general-interest topic, building causal identification, strengthening theory models, checking robustness, to mastering the writing style and managing the final submission package. It ensures the academic output meets the high standards of a top-tier economics journal.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for academic manuscript creation, guiding researchers through the entire process from initial topic selection to final submission and rebuttal. It diagnoses current manuscript bottlenecks (e.g., missing mechanism analysis, weak identification) and prescribes the next specialized skill to use, ensuring logical flow and adherence to high-level journal standards.

This comprehensive router guides researchers through the entire manuscript lifecycle for submissions to Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It determines the optimal sequence of specialized skills needed at every stage, from initial topic selection and theoretical development, through rigorous data analysis, contribution framing, to final submission and rebuttal preparation. Use this when you need to diagnose a bottleneck or determine the next necessary step in your academic writing process.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of submitting a manuscript to the Financial Management (FM) journal. It is designed to diagnose the current bottleneck and sequence the specialized steps needed, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature positioning to empirical design, writing refinement, and rebuttal letter strategies. It ensures the work meets the high standards of applied finance journals.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage process for submitting camera-ready versions for a top-tier academic conference like FOCS. It details the critical difference between the official IEEE proceedings and the public arXiv/ECCC full version. Key steps include de-anonymization, maintaining source consistency across both documents, updating author details, and preparing for conference talks and awards eligibility.

This guide addresses the unique challenge of structuring very long technical papers for academic venues like FOCS, where the committee reads a summary (the 'window') and expert reviewers must read the full proof (the 'supplementary'). It details best practices for organizing discretionary material, implementing robust pointer discipline, and ensuring self-containment to satisfy both quick-read and deep-dive readers.

This comprehensive router guides authors through the entire writing and revision lifecycle for submissions to Human Relations (HR). It diagnoses common academic bottlenecks—from topic selection and theoretical development to data analysis and rebuttal strategies—ensuring the manuscript meets the rigorous interdisciplinary standards of the journal. It acts as a navigational map, suggesting the optimal sequence of specialized skills.

A comprehensive, final-gate audit guide for submitting papers to major robotics conferences like ICRA using the PaperPlaza system. It details mandatory technical specifications, including page limits (6 content + 2 refs), IEEE two-column compliance, double-anonymous rules, video attachment specs, and critical deadlines. Essential reading to prevent submission rejection or administrative disqualification.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing academic manuscripts aimed at the International Economic Review (IER). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current bottleneck in the writing process. It guides the user through the entire rigorous workflow—from initial topic selection and theory modeling to empirical identification, robustness checks, and submission readiness—ensuring the paper is structured for maximum academic impact.

This comprehensive guide addresses the unique challenges of submitting research to top-tier conferences that do not include formal author-response or major revision rounds. It teaches authors a proactive strategy: how to pre-empt potential reviewer objections (e.g., novelty, scope limitations) by embedding necessary arguments, proofs, and context directly into the initial submission. Furthermore, it provides actionable plans for navigating both acceptance (camera-ready fixes) and rejection (diagnosis and strategic rerouting) without relying on traditional appeal processes.

This guide provides detailed structural advice for authors submitting methods papers to the Journal of Business & Economic Statistics (JBES). It teaches how to balance methodological novelty and empirical relevance, ensuring that both are clearly stated and equally foregrounded in the abstract and introduction, rather than burying one aspect in excessive prose.

This router guides researchers through the complex process of preparing a manuscript for the Journal of Economic Geography (JEG). It determines the optimal sequence of specialized skills needed at each stage—from initial topic selection, theoretical modeling, and robustness checks to drafting a rebuttal. It is designed to ensure the paper meets the unique interdisciplinary standards required to satisfy both economic and geographical reviewers.