Skill UI

This skill provides a comprehensive, year-round workflow guide for submitting research papers to the CoRL Conference on Robot Learning. It meticulously breaks down the annual cycle into manageable phases—including pre-submission preparation, managing reviewer feedback, crafting rebuttals, and preparing camera-ready versions. It assists teams in planning their efforts across critical milestones and navigating the academic publishing process.

A comprehensive guide for managing the entire lifecycle of major academic conference submissions (e.g., CVPR). It details critical timelines, from initial scope freezing and paper drafting to supplement submission, rebuttal writing, and resubmission strategies across different venues (ICCV, ECCV). Focuses heavily on project management and coordination to prevent process failures.

A comprehensive guide on structuring responses to peer reviews for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., DAC, ICCAD). It provides strategies for writing rebuttals, transforming reviews into actionable fixes, and adapting the response style for both conference resubmission and journal formats, emphasizing evidence over argument.

This comprehensive guide outlines a detailed, backward-planning workflow for submitting research papers to major AI conferences like ECAI or IJCAI-ECAI. It covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence type planning to abstract submission, full paper drafting, rebuttal response, and final camera-ready publication, ensuring authors meet strict deadlines and adhere to rigorous review standards.

A detailed auditing guide for submitting to major academic conferences, such as ECCV. It covers critical aspects including multi-stage submission deadlines (CET timezone), strict LNCS formatting rules (14 pages single-column), policy adherence (dual-submission, embargo rules), and pre-upload checks to mitigate rejection risks. Essential for researchers managing academic publishing workflows.

This comprehensive guide details the specific, commissioned submission process for the Economic Policy journal. It serves as a crucial preflight checklist for authors, covering all necessary stages: from developing a timely policy pitch and creating a conference-ready draft, to preparing the final camera-ready version. It is vital for authors to understand that EP operates via an invitation system and does not accept open submissions.

This comprehensive guide outlines the mandatory steps for authors preparing their accepted EDBT paper for open-access publication on OpenProceedings.org. It details critical processes, including template adherence, completing the CC-BY-NC-ND open-access license, entering ISBN metadata, de-anonymizing content, and permanently linking artifacts using DOIs, ensuring a smooth publishing workflow.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit guide specifically designed for submitting papers to the EuroSys conference. It covers critical details including abstract registration gates, strict formatting rules (12 pages, two-column layout), rigorous anonymity standards, and best practices for managing the HotCRP submission process, ensuring compliance before review.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage process for submitting camera-ready versions for a top-tier academic conference like FOCS. It details the critical difference between the official IEEE proceedings and the public arXiv/ECCC full version. Key steps include de-anonymization, maintaining source consistency across both documents, updating author details, and preparing for conference talks and awards eligibility.

This guide details the necessary workflow for organizing supplementary academic content, such as code, extensive methodologies, and raw data, across various conference submission phases. It emphasizes placing only core arguments in the main body, keeping sensitive materials anonymized in the mirror, and preparing a staging shelf for efficient revision.

This detailed project management skill provides a comprehensive, backward-planning guide for submitting to highly structured academic conferences, such as HPCA. It maps out critical milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence locking to review, revision, and final camera-ready submission—while identifying common failure modes and coordination requirements to maximize acceptance chances.