Skill UI

This tool generates a detailed, local 'receipt' or impact report of all Claude Code activity recorded in local session transcripts. It cross-references this data with your local Git history to provide a quantifiable measure of effort and project contribution. Ideal for performance reviews, budget justifications, or self-auditing usage.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts intended for the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ). It guides users through the entire writing lifecycle, determining the correct next step based on the current development stage and the paper's dominant education-research lens (e.g., policy, teaching, development). It is designed to ensure the contribution is pitched to the whole field, not just a subfield.

This skill guides authors in evaluating whether their chemical engineering manuscript meets the high standards of the AIChE Journal. It helps authors re-frame application-specific work into generalizable principles, focusing on fundamental scientific advances, rigorous modeling, and comprehensive experimental validation, ensuring the contribution transcends a single process.

This guide provides detailed instructions for structuring the introduction of academic manuscripts, particularly for high-stakes, double-blind review journals. It teaches authors how to frame their research contribution by engaging a live, recognized academic debate, precisely locating the marginal intellectual gap, and strictly maintaining anonymity through third-person self-citation.

This comprehensive workflow acts as a systematic router for authors writing empirical management papers for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theory development, through rigorous methodology and data analysis, to refining writing style, and finally managing the submission and rebuttal process. It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of theoretical and empirical contribution required by top-tier academic journals.

This comprehensive workflow guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of developing a purely theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) submission. It acts as a router, directing the user to specific specialized skills at each point of the scholarly writing process, from topic selection to contribution framing and final polish. It emphasizes that the deliverable is pure theory, not empirical data.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for the entire manuscript lifecycle directed towards publishing in Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR). It does not generate content but guides the user through the necessary steps, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final rebuttal preparation. Use it when you are unsure of the next optimal step or are bouncing between different stages of writing.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to pressure-test the academic fit of their project for top-tier criminology journals. It guides authors on moving beyond descriptive data analysis to achieve general theoretical contributions, differentiating between Articles and Research Notes, and ensuring the work advances core debates in the field of crime and deviance.

This tool serves as the central orchestrator for Criminology manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial idea generation to final submission and rebuttal. It ensures the manuscript makes a theoretical or measurement contribution, rather than just reporting a correlation, by routing the user to the appropriate specialized skill based on the paper's stage and conceptual gap.

This skill is a comprehensive guide designed to help authors position their academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals, specifically focusing on the standards of *Economic Science*. It provides detailed advice on article structure, necessary econometric methodologies (e.g., DID, IV, RDD), core academic contribution points, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring manuscripts meet the high standards of academic rigor and relevance.

This guide helps researchers determine if their academic topic possesses sufficient breadth of interest for major, general-interest economics journals, such as the European Economic Review (EER). It provides frameworks and checklists to diagnose whether a contribution is too niche or if it can be successfully reframed to appeal to a non-specialist audience, ensuring it passes initial desk-reject filters.

This advanced routing skill guides researchers through the complex process of submitting manuscripts in agriculture, environment, and earth science. It does not replace a single journal profile, but rather classifies the work by sub-field, contribution type, and evidence shape. By evaluating pre-routing gates (e.g., evidence strength, scale match), it determines the best specialist venue for re-framing and submission.