Skill UI

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers to the AAMAS conference. It details all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, abstract submission, double-blind review, rebuttal, and final camera-ready preparation. Essential for managing complex research involving game theory and multi-agent systems.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed to guide authors through the rigorous preparation process for submitting academic manuscripts to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It covers critical steps such as adopting double-blind anonymity, mandatory author commitment forms, ensuring originality, and meeting the high formatting standards required for top-tier publications in control and automation theory.

A comprehensive preflight guide for authors submitting to the Journal of Economic Theory (JET). It verifies critical technical formatting, reference compliance, ethical disclosures (AI use, data policy), and structural requirements necessary for successful submission via Elsevier Editorial Manager.

This specialized tool guides researchers in critically evaluating if an academic idea or dataset qualifies as a genuine, theory-contributing international-business phenomenon. It implements a rigorous multi-gate test, analyzing the phenomenon, level of analysis, international theory contribution, and cross-national variation needed for high-impact publishing in journals like JIBS.

This router guides authors through the rigorous, theory-first pipeline required for mathematical finance manuscripts. It helps determine the current stage (e.g., topic selection, proof architecture, contribution framing, revision) and identifies the critical bottleneck, ensuring the paper meets the high standards of major academic journals. Useful for starting new papers or troubleshooting mid-project issues.

This tool acts as an expert orchestrator and router for academic manuscripts in New Media and Society (NM&S). It guides researchers through the complex, interdisciplinary writing lifecycle, ensuring the work maintains both conceptual focus and methodological rigor. Users are routed to specific sub-skills based on their current stage (e.g., identifying a topic, building theory, conducting data analysis, or revising after reviewer feedback) and their chosen method (e.g., qualitative interviews, computational analysis, critical discourse analysis).

This skill is designed to help researchers critically assess whether their project aligns with the scope of Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It guides users to pressure-test the core contribution: the link between social structure, process, and the individual. It helps frame the research question, determine the appropriate tradition (e.g., identity theory, symbolic interaction), and decide whether the final output should be a full Article or a focused Note.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) submissions, guiding authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle. It routes the user based on the research stage, the sociological tradition (e.g., symbolic interaction, social structure), and the article type (Article vs. Note). Its core function is ensuring the paper maintains the critical link between the individual and society, directing the user to the appropriate specialized skill for design, theory, data, and writing.