Skill UI

This toolset provides comprehensive automation for Cal.com scheduling operations through Rube MCP. It enables users to manage the entire booking lifecycle, including listing and creating bookings, checking real-time availability and finding open slots, configuring and managing webhooks for event triggers, and managing organizational teams. It is essential for integrating scheduling workflows into larger automation processes.

Automates the complete DocuSign e-signature lifecycle using Rube MCP. This tool enables users to list document templates, create and send secure envelopes, assign recipient roles, and monitor real-time signing status. It streamlines document management and contract workflows from draft to completion.

This tool streamlines the entire meeting preparation lifecycle. By integrating Notion context, performing targeted searches, and enriching content with Codex research, users can draft structured agendas, pre-reads, and decision documents. It ensures all necessary background information, owners, timeboxes, and industry insights are compiled for highly effective meetings.

A comprehensive project management guide for the entire academic lifecycle of submitting a paper to a top-tier conference like AISTATS. It maps all crucial milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence freezing to abstract submission, review discussion, and final camera-ready publication—providing backward-planning heuristics and risk assessment to ensure timely and high-quality submissions.

This workflow router serves as the central orchestrator for academic articles submitted to art history journals. It guides authors through the complex, multi-stage publishing lifecycle, from initial topic selection and scholarly positioning to visual analysis, evidence gathering, and final submission. Crucially, it proactively manages the often-overlooked and time-consuming process of image rights and permissions, ensuring authors do not delay this critical step until the end.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex, multi-stage workflow for submitting a systems paper to a major academic conference (like ASPLOS). It maps out timelines across two submission gates, revision cycles, hardware evidence gathering (T-8 to T-2), and critical role assignments required to successfully navigate the intense academic publication process.

Use this comprehensive guide to manage the entire project lifecycle for a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper submission. It provides a backward-planning timeline, covering topics from initial concept fitting and evidence locking to the two-stage review process, optional artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission. Essential for managing technical academic deadlines and mitigating common failure modes.

This comprehensive orchestrator guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It is designed to ensure that the paper maintains a genuinely comparative argument—across countries, regions, or time—at every stage, routing the user to the correct next skill (e.g., theory building, research design, data analysis). It does not generate content; it directs the scholarly workflow.

A comprehensive guide for managing the entire lifecycle of major academic conference submissions (e.g., CVPR). It details critical timelines, from initial scope freezing and paper drafting to supplement submission, rebuttal writing, and resubmission strategies across different venues (ICCV, ECCV). Focuses heavily on project management and coordination to prevent process failures.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission process for IEEE S&P, which operates across multiple self-contained cycles. This workflow map covers critical milestones like abstract registration, full paper submission, ethical review latency (IRB/disclosure), and planning for all three academic outcomes: Accept, Revise, or Reject. Essential for researchers managing multi-stage academic publishing timelines.

A comprehensive project management guide designed for managing high-stakes scientific conference submissions (e.g., INTERSPEECH). It maps the rigorous annual cycle, from initial drafting and submission deadlines to camera-ready production and final conference presentation. The guide outlines specific milestones, roles, risk patterns, and backward planning techniques to ensure timely and high-quality project completion.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire lifecycle of submitting and revising academic papers for major conferences like OOPSLA. It details strategic decisions, such as choosing between October or March submission rounds, managing the state machine (Accept, Minor, Major Revision, Reject), budgeting time for necessary revisions, and planning post-publication artifacts and talks. Essential for academic research teams.