Skill UI

Generate a Google Form tailored for event or session feedback and quickly distribute it to participants through Gmail, automating the survey creation and invitation process for productivity boosts.

An agent skill simulating high-pressure big-tech corporate culture. It enforces strict owner consciousness, end-to-end validation, and role-based behaviors (P7-P10) using escalating PUA feedback to drive developers or sub-agents to deliver high-quality results.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer reviewer feedback and revision comments for top-tier academic journals. It teaches structured rebuttal writing, handling disagreements while maintaining professionalism, and managing multi-round revisions to systematically increase publication probability.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for managing the entire manuscript development lifecycle for Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS). It guides users through the necessary stages—from initial topic selection and theoretical framing to data analysis, drafting, and responding to reviewer feedback. It is designed to help users determine the next specialized skill required at any point in the academic publishing process.

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps for authors preparing accepted papers for camera-ready publication in the Springer LNCS open-access format. It details the process of de-anonymizing the manuscript, completing essential Springer metadata (ORCID, author order), integrating reviewer feedback, and making all research artifacts permanent using DOIs. Following this checklist is crucial for successful publication.

This skill provides a comprehensive, year-round workflow guide for submitting research papers to the CoRL Conference on Robot Learning. It meticulously breaks down the annual cycle into manageable phases—including pre-submission preparation, managing reviewer feedback, crafting rebuttals, and preparing camera-ready versions. It assists teams in planning their efforts across critical milestones and navigating the academic publishing process.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

This guide details the mandatory steps required after acceptance to prepare a paper for IEEE Xplore publication. It covers critical technical requirements, including full de-anonymization, adherence to the IEEEtran format and page limits, completing the electronic Copyright Form (eCF), passing PDF eXpress validation, and integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for final publication. It details the requirements for a dual-publisher format (ACM and IEEE), covering mandatory steps like de-anonymization, completing dual metadata (ORCID, CCS, DOI), integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep, and permanentizing dataset/firmware links using public DOI archives. This ensures the submission meets the highest standards for academic rigor and publishing platforms.

An essential workflow router designed for authors submitting original research to the Journal of Educational Psychology. This guide orchestrates the entire manuscript lifecycle, from initial topic selection and study design to addressing reviewer feedback (R&R) and ensuring adherence to strict standards like APA 7th, masked review, and Transparency and Openness (TOP). It helps authors navigate the specific requirements of publishing impactful, educationally relevant psychological research.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing a survey or review article for the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, from initial topic selection and proposing the scope to systematic literature synthesis, structuring the argument, and handling revisions based on editor/referee feedback. It ensures the output is a scholarly synthesis, not a primary research paper.

This skill guides researchers through drafting a robust and credible response to major academic revisions (R&R) from top-tier journals, particularly in institutional economics. It teaches how to systematically decode editor feedback, separate core conceptual challenges from technical gaps, and structure a point-by-point reply that addresses deal-breakers effectively, ensuring the response is substantive and highly responsive.