Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting data-intensive systems papers to top-tier conferences (like ICDE). It details how to structure the paper, ensure technical claims are reconstructable, quantify all performance gains with associated costs, and compress complex ideas into a limited page budget while maintaining scholarly rigor.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) via ScholarOne. This guide details critical academic publishing standards, including the 25-page limit, single-blind review rules, required LaTeX formatting, and the mandatory structure for the GitHub code/data reproducibility deposit. Use this when performing the final checks before submission.

This router guides authors through the entire academic workflow for submissions to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It structures the process from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and rebuttal phase, ensuring the computational contribution is the central focus. It helps authors maintain flow and address the specific demands of the OR/CS intersection.

This guide helps researchers strategically position their database, data management, or analytics papers for the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). It provides deep insights into conference positioning, required evidence (scale, systems depth), optimal structure, and how to compare the work against top venue standards. Use it before submission to refine your narrative and meet the archival standards of a flagship database conference.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assemble and audit the Supporting Information (SI) for a Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) manuscript. It ensures every reported chemical result and structure is fully reproducible by an independent chemist, covering detailed procedures, full characterization data (NMR, HRMS, IR), stereochemistry, and crystallographic details (CIF/CCDC).

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing manuscripts for the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV). It does not write the content but guides the user through the necessary sequence of specialized skills—from initial topic selection and theory development, through data analysis, writing style refinement, to final submission and rebuttal planning. Use this when you need a structured plan for tackling a complex academic paper.

This skill orchestrates the complete manuscript lifecycle for submissions to the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF). It guides users through all critical stages, including initial topic selection, establishing robust empirical identification strategies, rigorous data analysis, structured writing, and final submission and revision. It acts as a comprehensive process manager, ensuring all academic and procedural gates are cleared before submission.

This router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of writing a manuscript targeting the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME). It acts as a structured workflow navigator, helping diagnose bottlenecks and determine the next critical step—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to data analysis, writing style refinement, and final rebuttal preparation. It is essential for maintaining consistency with high-level academic journal standards.

This guide details the optimal structure for writing a high-quality literature review, especially for quantitative economics journals. It advises users to avoid chronological descriptions and instead organize the review around the core method lineage (how a quantity is measured, forecasted, or decomposed) and the specific application gap in China's data context. This ensures the literature review logically and powerfully leads to the paper's unique contribution.

This skill guides authors through the rigorous academic publication review process. It details the multi-stage steps—from initial intake screening (identifying data dumps or parochialism) to double-anonymous external review—to help authors predict potential reviewer objections, understand the likely outcome, and strategically strengthen the manuscript structure before submission.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured project management workflow for academic research targeting the NAACL conference. It addresses the unique challenge of NAACL's irregular calendar (skipped years) by providing a detailed backward planning timeline, managing milestones (data freeze, paper freeze, ARR upload), and implementing a critical decision tree for committing, waiting, or rerouting submissions when conference windows shift.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of an Organization Science manuscript, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission. It does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the correct next step and maintain coherence throughout the complex academic writing process.