Skill UI

This skill automatically generates professional, structured conference presentation slides (PDF/PPTX) from a compiled academic paper. It intelligently adapts the content depth and slide count based on the specified talk type (e.g., oral, spotlight) and duration. Users can also optionally guide the structural rhythm of the talk by referencing another source paper's style.

This skill intercepts the response flow before generation, allowing the user to explicitly control the desired depth, length, and token usage of the AI's answer. It estimates the complexity of the input prompt and presents multiple options (e.g., 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%), ensuring the output matches the user's need, whether they require a brief summary or a comprehensive, detailed analysis.

This advanced orchestrator manages complex internal business workflows, covering process mapping, vendor management, capacity planning, and procurement optimization. It acts as a central router, classifying multi-signal inquiries and delegating tasks to specialized sub-skills (e.g., knowledge-ops, vendor-management). It follows a structured, depth-first workflow and returns actionable, digested reports anchored in documentation and next steps.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors targeting Cancer Cell. It outlines the strict requirements for mechanistic depth, translational relevance, and evidence (e.g., orthogonal perturbations, in vivo models). Use this skill to re-frame your manuscript and ensure it meets the journal's high standards before official submission.

A comprehensive guide designed to assess whether a molecular or translational oncology study meets the high standards of a top-tier journal like Cancer Cell. It helps researchers critically evaluate their work's mechanistic depth and translational relevance, providing actionable steps before investing in full manuscript submission.

This skill provides a comprehensive pre-submission review for manuscripts targeting Cell Reports Medicine. It assesses the manuscript's fit regarding scope (translational and clinical research with mechanistic depth), evidence bar (requiring strong validation and causality), and house style. It helps authors determine if their work aligns with the journal's requirements before official submission.

A comprehensive guide for researchers evaluating the suitability of their economic manuscript for submission to China Economic Studies. It analyzes the journal's scope, required theoretical depth, preferred research themes (e.g., economic growth, finance, regional economy), and structural requirements, acting as a pre-submission checklist to enhance publication chances.

This skill is a comprehensive guide for authors targeting top-tier academic journals, such as Econometrica. It provides a rigorous checklist covering the required depth of econometric theory, the novelty of identification results, structural modeling requirements, and the necessary formal structure (proofs, asymptotics, supplementary materials). Use this tool to re-frame and vet manuscripts against the highest academic standards.

This comprehensive guide assists academic researchers in assessing the fit of their manuscripts for the journal Governance Studies. It outlines the journal's scope (national, local, digital governance, public policy), required theoretical depth, suitable methodologies (policy evaluation, case studies), and structural requirements. It serves as a crucial editorial checklist to prevent mis-submission and optimize the writing process for Chinese public administration and governance research.

This guide helps researchers strategically position their database, data management, or analytics papers for the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). It provides deep insights into conference positioning, required evidence (scale, systems depth), optimal structure, and how to compare the work against top venue standards. Use it before submission to refine your narrative and meet the archival standards of a flagship database conference.

This skill acts as an expert orchestrator and router for authors preparing submissions to the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). It guides users through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection to final rebuttal. Crucially, it enforces JPART's defining gate: the paper must demonstrate a clear contribution to public-management theory, rather than just presenting strong empirical findings or policy recommendations. Ideal for early-stage conceptualization or when feedback suggests the work lacks theoretical depth.

This orchestrator guides writers through the entire process of developing academic philosophical articles. It acts as a sophisticated router, prioritizing the establishment of a sharp thesis and a sound argument before content polishing. By analyzing the submission stage and content type (e.g., Article, Book Review, Discussion), it maps out the optimal writing path, ensuring structural integrity and argumentative depth for academic publishing.