Skill UI

A comprehensive audit checklist designed for authors preparing HCI papers for submission to ACM CHI. This guide verifies critical aspects such as single-column formatting, adherence to word-count norms (5,000–8,000 words), mandatory sub-committee designation, and strict anonymization protocols to prevent desk rejection before uploading to PCS.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for Communication Research (CR) manuscripts. It guides users through the entire academic publishing lifecycle, assessing whether a manuscript is quantitative, theory-driven, and methodologically sound. It routes the user to the appropriate specialized sub-skill (e.g., design, analysis, theory-building) based on the study type (experiment, survey, content analysis) and the current stage of the research process.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts submitted to Conservation Biology. It guides authors through the entire scientific writing lifecycle, helping them determine the appropriate article type (e.g., Review, Essay, Contributed Paper) and the necessary sequence of sub-skills (from study design to data analysis and relevance checks). It ensures the final work has direct, transferable implications for the conservation of biological diversity.

This router guide is specifically designed for researchers writing manuscripts for Chinese Public Administration journals. It does not replace specialized skills but serves as a comprehensive diagnostic tool, guiding the user through the entire academic writing process—from initial topic selection and literature review, to methodology refinement, policy implication drafting, and handling reviewer rebuttals. It helps pinpoint the current bottleneck in the research pipeline.

This comprehensive orchestrator guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It is designed to ensure that the paper maintains a genuinely comparative argument—across countries, regions, or time—at every stage, routing the user to the correct next skill (e.g., theory building, research design, data analysis). It does not generate content; it directs the scholarly workflow.

This tool serves as the comprehensive orchestrator for manuscripts submitted to Demography (PAA). It guides authors through the entire population science publishing lifecycle. By assessing the manuscript's current stage (e.g., topic selection, research design, data analysis, rebuttal) and determining the appropriate article type (Research Article, Note, or Commentary), it routes the user to the next specialized skill or writing phase required for successful submission.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for Developmental Psychology submissions, guiding authors through the entire academic writing lifecycle. It helps users systematize their work from initial conceptualization and defining developmental claims (age effects, within-person change) to selecting the appropriate design (cross-sectional, longitudinal, micro-genetic), conducting rigorous analysis, and fulfilling modern standards like APA 7th and Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP). It maps the full journey from idea to rebuttal.

This skill is a comprehensive guide designed to help authors position their academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals, specifically focusing on the standards of *Economic Science*. It provides detailed advice on article structure, necessary econometric methodologies (e.g., DID, IV, RDD), core academic contribution points, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring manuscripts meet the high standards of academic rigor and relevance.

A comprehensive workflow guide for routing clinical medicine manuscripts. It classifies studies by specialty, study design (RCT, observational, review), and evidence strength, helping authors select the optimal journal venue (e.g., JAMA, Lancet) for submission and re-framing. It emphasizes matching the manuscript to specialized society guidelines and evidence hierarchy.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit guide specifically designed for submitting papers to the EuroSys conference. It covers critical details including abstract registration gates, strict formatting rules (12 pages, two-column layout), rigorous anonymity standards, and best practices for managing the HotCRP submission process, ensuring compliance before review.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process at the European Sociological Review (ESR). It helps authors anticipate reviewer critiques on comparative design, quantitative modeling, and theoretical contribution, ensuring the manuscript is structured for success before submission.