Skill UI

This skill automatically drafts professional email replies for multiple corporate accounts. It handles various communication intents, including intro acceptances, scheduling follow-ups, acknowledgments, and positive replies. It operates strictly in draft-only mode, ensuring drafts are ready for user review but never sent automatically. It is ideal for automating responses triggered by new emails, webhooks, or action item follow-ups.

This skill monitors Todoist for tasks that are due or overdue and require follow-up (email, ping, etc.). It automatically drafts highly contextual emails by combining task descriptions, retrieved meeting transcripts (from Granola/Grain), and prior email history. Drafts are created directly in Gmail and the user is notified via WhatsApp, saving significant time on manual follow-ups and ensuring context-aware communication.

Orchestrates an executive’s schedule, inbox, and communications through the gws toolchain, running standup, meeting prep, and digest workflows while triaging mail, scheduling events, and drafting professional replies.

This tool streamlines the entire meeting preparation lifecycle. By integrating Notion context, performing targeted searches, and enriching content with Codex research, users can draft structured agendas, pre-reads, and decision documents. It ensures all necessary background information, owners, timeboxes, and industry insights are compiled for highly effective meetings.

This meta-skill is designed for drafting and producing new academic or research papers and LaTeX manuscripts. It orchestrates a multi-step workflow, handling source search, citation planning, drafting, length checks, and final LaTeX/PDF compilation. It supports both compact outlines and full, publication-ready manuscripts.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for managing the entire manuscript development lifecycle for Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS). It guides users through the necessary stages—from initial topic selection and theoretical framing to data analysis, drafting, and responding to reviewer feedback. It is designed to help users determine the next specialized skill required at any point in the academic publishing process.

This tool serves as the central entry point and orchestrator for drafting an American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscript. It guides authors through the complex academic publishing lifecycle by determining the paper's specific track (e.g., Regular Article, Synthesis, Registered Report) and its current developmental stage (e.g., Idea, Theory, Data Analysis). It does not draft content; rather, it routes the user to the most relevant sub-skill for the next step in the writing process.

This guide provides a comprehensive structure and best practices for drafting academic cover letters and pre-submission inquiries for high-impact scientific journals, such as Cancer Cell. It covers essential elements including articulating the core advance, justifying journal fit, detailing evidence strength, managing reviewer suggestions, and adhering to professional submission standards, ensuring your manuscript stands out to editors.

This guide assists researchers in transforming academic findings into highly actionable and evidence-based policy recommendations. It specifically addresses the standards required for top-tier journals in public administration, emphasizing the mandatory link between observed 'Discovery' and proposed 'Suggestion' via an underlying 'Mechanism.' It teaches how to avoid generic filler language and structure policy suggestions around specific actors, stages, and concrete actions.

A specialized guide for structuring the policy implications section of high-level finance and trade economics manuscripts. It teaches authors how to move beyond vague suggestions, anchoring policy recommendations in concrete Chinese fiscal, financial, or trade policy tools, and linking them directly to the paper's empirical evidence and mechanisms.

A comprehensive guide for managing the entire lifecycle of major academic conference submissions (e.g., CVPR). It details critical timelines, from initial scope freezing and paper drafting to supplement submission, rebuttal writing, and resubmission strategies across different venues (ICCV, ECCV). Focuses heavily on project management and coordination to prevent process failures.

This comprehensive guide outlines a detailed, backward-planning workflow for submitting research papers to major AI conferences like ECAI or IJCAI-ECAI. It covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence type planning to abstract submission, full paper drafting, rebuttal response, and final camera-ready publication, ensuring authors meet strict deadlines and adhere to rigorous review standards.