Skill UI

Assists authorized reviewers in preparing evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports reporting-guideline selection, claim–evidence checks, methods, statistics, reproducibility, and ethics critique.

Draft, revise, and audit scientific manuscripts with evidence provenance, reporting guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation.

This skill guides authors through the unique requirements of submitting macro-policy research to venues like Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (BPEA). It serves as a comprehensive fit-check, covering journal positioning, evidence bar, required framing, and the conference/solicited submission workflow. Use it to re-frame academic work to meet the standards of real-time policy relevance and clear policy implication.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors targeting Cancer Cell. It outlines the strict requirements for mechanistic depth, translational relevance, and evidence (e.g., orthogonal perturbations, in vivo models). Use this skill to re-frame your manuscript and ensure it meets the journal's high standards before official submission.

This comprehensive skill guides authors on assessing the suitability and preparing manuscripts for Chemical Society Reviews (Chem Soc Rev). It covers journal positioning, structural requirements (e.g., tutorial vs. critical review), method-and-evidence bar, house style, and a detailed pre-submission checklist to minimize desk-reject risks. Use this tool when targeting this specific RSC venue or comparing it against other review journals.

A detailed guide for researchers submitting papers to China Industrial Economics. It outlines the journal's specific focus on rigorous empirical evidence, policy evaluation, industrial organization, and the digital/regional economy. The guide emphasizes best practices for methodology (e.g., DID, event-study), robustness checks, mechanism testing, and ensuring actionable policy implications.

This skill is designed to assess the suitability of international macroeconomics and finance manuscripts for the IMF Economic Review. It evaluates the paper's fit, theoretical rigor, evidence quality, and adherence to open-economy principles. It provides crucial pre-submission self-checks, potential desk-reject risks, and re-routing suggestions to guide authors toward the most appropriate academic venue.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. It assesses the suitability of clinical studies across endocrine and metabolic systems, covering scope, required evidence standards, reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE), and house style. Use this tool for pre-submission self-checking to ensure your manuscript meets the journal's high academic and clinical standards.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for authors aiming to submit catalysis research to Nature Catalysis. It assesses not only the technical scope (heterogeneous, homogeneous, electrocatalysis) but also the mechanistic depth, broad significance, required evidence (in situ spectroscopy, DFT), and adherence to the journal's strict house style and formatting guidelines.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the New Journal of Physics (NJP). It helps authors assess if their broad-scope physics manuscript is a suitable fit for the venue, detailing the required scope (e.g., quantum, AMO, condensed matter), the technical evidence bar, necessary structure, and house style requirements before official submission. This is a crucial pre-submission checklist and framing tool.

This skill guides authors on formatting and positioning manuscripts for Physical Review Letters (PRL). It is a comprehensive venue-selection and reframing tool, helping authors determine if their physics result has sufficient broad significance, immediacy, and rigor to meet PRL's high standards. It covers methodological evidence bars, required structure, cross-subfield argumentation, and best practices for pre-submission checks.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to Public Administration Review (PAR). It guides authors through mandatory final checks, including double-blind anonymization, adherence to strict word count limits (≤ 8,000 words), proper abstract length (≤ 150 words), APA formatting, and inclusion of Evidence for Practice points. Use this checklist before the final upload to avoid common formatting or procedural rejection reasons.