Skill UI

This tool functions as a post-task epilogue, designed to audit and record the entire research journey. It scans the conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract critical research artifacts, including decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and major pivots. It systematically writes this provenance data into the structured `ara/` directory, ensuring a faithful and auditable trace of how the project truly evolved.

Orchestrates a text-only resubmission of a polished academic paper to a different venue under hard constraints: no new experiments, no bibliography edits, no framework changes, and no overwriting of prior submission directories. It composes the paper into a sibling directory while absorbing prior reviewer concerns through constrained microedits.

This skill analyzes comprehensive sprint delivery data, including ticket completion rates, carry-over analysis, and unplanned work. It generates a structured, data-grounded retrospective brief, transforming raw metrics into concrete discussion prompts (Start/Stop/Continue) and actionable, testable experiments for the next iteration. It helps teams focus on measurable solutions rather than subjective debates.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, double-blind academic rebuttal for conferences (like PerCom). This skill focuses on addressing explicit reviewer questions using only evidence already present in the submitted paper, thereby avoiding the promise of new experiments. It covers maintaining anonymity, structuring arguments, and focusing on core technical dimensions like cross-subject evaluation and metric soundness.