Skill UI

This skill guides authors on formatting and positioning manuscripts for Physical Review Letters (PRL). It is a comprehensive venue-selection and reframing tool, helping authors determine if their physics result has sufficient broad significance, immediacy, and rigor to meet PRL's high standards. It covers methodological evidence bars, required structure, cross-subfield argumentation, and best practices for pre-submission checks.

This skill guides authors on assessing the suitability of their general biology manuscript for PLOS Biology. It covers the journal's high standards for scientific rigor, data availability, mandatory reporting guidelines (e.g., ARRIVE, CONSORT), and the structure of a plain-language Author Summary. Use this tool for venue selection and optimizing your submission to maximize publication chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting PLOS Medicine. It outlines the journal's scope, required methodological rigor (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), house style, and essential pre-submission checks. Use this when assessing if a clinical, public health, or epidemiological manuscript meets the journal's high open-access standards.

This guide assists authors in determining if their literary or language-studies manuscript is suitable for PMLA, the flagship journal of the Modern Language Association. It covers general-interest argument framing, close reading expectations, MLA house style compliance, and best practices for scholarly engagement, helping authors re-frame highly specialized work for a broad academic audience.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to convert various citation styles (such as APA or Harvard author-date) into the specific, numbered format required by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). It covers numbered citations by order of appearance, full author listing, abbreviated journal titles, and specific formats for articles, books, and datasets, ensuring manuscripts meet high academic publishing standards.

This tool acts as a comprehensive router for academic manuscript preparation, guiding authors through the complex stages of publishing for high-impact journals like PNAS Nexus. It does not write content, but rather diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it requires addressing open access rules, polishing the significance statement, refining figures, or structuring the rebuttal. It ensures authors follow the optimal, structured path from initial concept to final submission.

This router guides researchers through the complex, multi-stage lifecycle of writing a broad, integrative, or theoretical 'perspective' article for high-impact journals like PoPS. It dictates the next necessary scholarly skill (e.g., literature synthesis, framework building, editor strategy, revision) based on the manuscript's current stage, helping authors transition from initial concept to final submission and revision.

This guide serves as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing a high-impact physics Letter for Physical Review Letters (PRL). It does not replace specialized skills but guides users through the entire publication pipeline—from confirming the scientific scope and framing the central claim, to managing methodology, figures, length, and revision responses, ensuring the manuscript meets strict journal standards.

This skill guides authors on crafting authoritative, comprehensive, and critical reviews for top-tier materials science journals. It emphasizes moving beyond simple literature summaries to provide deep, balanced, and critical synthesis of an entire field's state-of-the-art. Use this when developing a major review manuscript or determining if your work fits the scope of a high-impact, field-spanning publication.

A comprehensive guide and fit test designed to help researchers assess whether their empirical psychology project meets the high standards of top-tier journals like Psychological Science. It evaluates key criteria including broad impact, statistical robustness, open science readiness (preregistration/data sharing), and adherence to strict format limits. Use this skill to pressure-test your idea before committing resources to data collection or analysis, guiding you toward the optimal manuscript type (e.g., Research Article vs. Registered Report).

This router guides the entire workflow for developing a high-quality academic manuscript targeting the Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users determine the next necessary step—be it theory development, data analysis, refining contributions, or preparing for submission and rebuttal—ensuring methodological rigor and structural completeness throughout the writing process.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of scholarly reviews, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and critical integrative syntheses. It maps out the necessary steps—from question scoping and protocol registration (PRISMA) through systematic searching, framework building, data coding, and final submission/revision—ensuring methodological rigor for high-impact academic journals.