Skill UI

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final, critical steps before submitting an academic manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal. It covers mandatory technical requirements, such as correctly separating figures (TIFF/EPS) from text (.doc/.rtf), adhering to specific style guides (e.g., Chicago author-date), confirming article type word counts, and addressing critical ethical statements and copyright assignments. Essential for ensuring smooth submission via platforms like Editorial Manager.

An essential workflow router designed for authors submitting original research to the Journal of Educational Psychology. This guide orchestrates the entire manuscript lifecycle, from initial topic selection and study design to addressing reviewer feedback (R&R) and ensuring adherence to strict standards like APA 7th, masked review, and Transparency and Openness (TOP). It helps authors navigate the specific requirements of publishing impactful, educationally relevant psychological research.

This tool acts as a comprehensive router for academic manuscript preparation, guiding authors through the complex stages of publishing for high-impact journals like PNAS Nexus. It does not write content, but rather diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it requires addressing open access rules, polishing the significance statement, refining figures, or structuring the rebuttal. It ensures authors follow the optimal, structured path from initial concept to final submission.

A comprehensive checklist for preparing academic manuscripts for submission to major financial journals. It guides authors through formatting rules, ensuring double-blind anonymization, preparing the Internet Appendix, writing a detailed cover letter, and addressing mandatory code release conditions, ensuring readiness before final portal submission.

This comprehensive guide serves as a router for structuring a high-quality academic manuscript targeting The Accounting Review (TAR). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current stage of the research—whether it's an initial vague idea, preliminary results, or addressing reviewer feedback—and recommends the next specialized skill module to use, ensuring a methodical progression from topic selection through final rebuttal.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to academic conferences, addressing strict page limitations where appendices count against the core budget. It details best practices for distributing supplementary evidence across three external homes: the main paper, dedicated arXiv technical reports, and artifact repositories. The guide emphasizes maintaining self-containment, managing version discipline, and strategically cutting content to ensure the core claims are reviewable.