Skill UI

Formats Markdown into Slack-ready HTML or mrkdwn, previews the Slack-style rendering, copies rich HTML to the clipboard, and optionally delivers announcements via webhooks for messages and notifications.

Command-line skill for sending Gmail messages with recipients, subject, body, HTML, attachments, CC/BCC, drafts, and a dry-run preview so automation scripts can deliver reports or notifications while respecting RFC encoding.

A comprehensive framework for assessing the operational and cultural health of a team. It covers key dimensions such as delivering value, morale, psychological safety, and release capability. Use this guide for structured retrospectives, leadership reviews, or post-incident analyses to identify root causes and generate actionable improvement plans.

Guides builders to verify task delivery by collecting required evidence such as CLI output, screenshots, or DOM snapshots, then submitting artifacts for review. Useful when a task must self-certify against a verify plan.

This guide provides detailed instructions for structuring the introduction of academic manuscripts, particularly for high-stakes, double-blind review journals. It teaches authors how to frame their research contribution by engaging a live, recognized academic debate, precisely locating the marginal intellectual gap, and strictly maintaining anonymity through third-person self-citation.

This comprehensive workflow guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of developing a purely theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) submission. It acts as a router, directing the user to specific specialized skills at each point of the scholarly writing process, from topic selection to contribution framing and final polish. It emphasizes that the deliverable is pure theory, not empirical data.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers preparing liver biology or disease studies for submission to Hepatology (AASLD). It meticulously reviews the journal's scope, evidence bar, reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and required structure. It helps authors determine if their mechanistic or clinical work is rigorous enough and appropriately framed for a top-tier, international audience.

This guide teaches advanced academic writers how to structure their papers by positioning their thesis within an ongoing, live scholarly debate. It emphasizes engaging with the strongest, canonical versions of existing views, rather than summarizing literature or attacking strawmen. It helps authors define the precise gap their work fills and state their unique contribution clearly.

This skill provides a structured framework for conducting comprehensive due diligence across legal, financial, operational, and compliance domains. It helps users identify missing documents, flag key risks (e.g., debt vs. equity, cash flow vs. profit), and clearly distinguish verified facts from assumptions or expert opinions. It delivers a preliminary gate assessment (PASS/ESCALATE/BLOCK), serving as a critical initial review tool, not a final legal opinion.