Skill UI

Automates the conversion of meeting notes from Granola into structured development artifacts. This pipeline uses Zapier and GitHub Actions to automatically extract action items and decisions, creating corresponding issues in GitHub, tasks in Linear, and summarizing updates in Slack. It ensures that meeting outcomes are immediately tracked and integrated into the development workflow.

This skill helps users maintain a structured and comprehensive record of their daily activities, progress, key decisions, and learning outcomes. It creates a dedicated file for each day using the ISO date format (yyyy-mm-dd), ensuring that all entries are organized chronologically. By adhering to concise, third-person reporting, it helps users build a valuable, reviewable knowledge base of their journey and accomplishments.

Generates a comprehensive, single-page HTML onboarding plan for new hires. This tool structures the entire new employee journey, including the first-week schedule, 30/60/90-day milestones, resource checklists, and key outcomes. Ideal for HR professionals needing standardized, visually appealing onboarding documentation.

This skill facilitates the systematic triage and closure of open promises or commitments within a project context. It guides the user to reliably close these commitments using verifiable, real-world outcomes via the acc_act(runtime="outcome") command. It emphasizes maintaining rigorous provenance discipline, ensuring that status updates are based only on external or runtime validated results, thereby maximizing data integrity and accountability.

This skill enforces rigorous meeting discipline through a four-stage workflow: Cost Gating, Timeboxed Agenda Building, Running the Meeting, and Action Item Extraction. It calculates meeting costs, ensures every agenda topic has a desired outcome, and converts raw notes into a structured, owner-assigned, due-dated checklist, flagging any missing owners or deadlines. Ideal for transforming unproductive meetings into actionable, accountable outcomes.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission process for IEEE S&P, which operates across multiple self-contained cycles. This workflow map covers critical milestones like abstract registration, full paper submission, ethical review latency (IRB/disclosure), and planning for all three academic outcomes: Accept, Revise, or Reject. Essential for researchers managing multi-stage academic publishing timelines.

This comprehensive guide addresses the unique challenges of submitting research to top-tier conferences that do not include formal author-response or major revision rounds. It teaches authors a proactive strategy: how to pre-empt potential reviewer objections (e.g., novelty, scope limitations) by embedding necessary arguments, proofs, and context directly into the initial submission. Furthermore, it provides actionable plans for navigating both acceptance (camera-ready fixes) and rejection (diagnosis and strategic rerouting) without relying on traditional appeal processes.

This skill helps researchers evaluate whether their macro-financial research question meets the scope and standards of the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME). It guides the identification of clear monetary, macro, or policy payoffs, ensuring the work addresses aggregate outcomes rather than narrow micro-effects, thereby significantly improving submission quality and target journal alignment.

This skill guides authors through the rigorous academic publication review process. It details the multi-stage steps—from initial intake screening (identifying data dumps or parochialism) to double-anonymous external review—to help authors predict potential reviewer objections, understand the likely outcome, and strategically strengthen the manuscript structure before submission.

A comprehensive guide for project-managing the demanding lifecycle of submitting a top-tier systems conference paper (e.g., OSDI). Covers critical deadlines, from initial title registration and full submission to artifact preparation and final paper revisions. It provides strategies for navigating review outcomes, retargeting to other venues (SOSP, NSDI), and utilizing the silent window for continuous improvement.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their cerebrovascular research is a strong fit for the journal Stroke (AHA/ASA). It outlines the specific scope, high evidence standards (e.g., prespecified outcomes, reporting guidelines like CONSORT/STROBE), house style, and detailed submission checklists required for academic publication in stroke and cerebrovascular medicine. It serves as a vital pre-submission feasibility assessment aid.

Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via acc_act(runtime="outcome"). Lists open commitments, grades outcomes, and enforces provenance discipline so only reality or owner validation counts.