Skill UI

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing manuscripts for top-tier policy economics journals, such as Economic Policy (EP). It does not replace specialized analysis skills but guides the user through the optimal sequence of specialized steps—from initial topic pitch and literature positioning, through modeling and robustness checks, to managing panel discussions and final revisions. It ensures the paper meets the dual standard of academic rigor and policy accessibility.

This comprehensive guide outlines the mandatory steps for authors preparing their accepted EDBT paper for open-access publication on OpenProceedings.org. It details critical processes, including template adherence, completing the CC-BY-NC-ND open-access license, entering ISBN metadata, de-anonymizing content, and permanently linking artifacts using DOIs, ensuring a smooth publishing workflow.

This comprehensive guide details the critical steps for converting an accepted EuroSys paper into the final ACM proceedings format. It covers complex template changes, mandatory metadata completion (eRights, ORCID), artifact linking, and ensuring absolute coherence between the final PDF and the ACM Digital Library record. Essential reading for authors preparing for final submission compliance.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit guide specifically designed for submitting papers to the EuroSys conference. It covers critical details including abstract registration gates, strict formatting rules (12 pages, two-column layout), rigorous anonymity standards, and best practices for managing the HotCRP submission process, ensuring compliance before review.

A comprehensive guide for revising academic papers submitted to FAccT (Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency). It instructs authors on how to frame socio-technical contributions to be legible to a mixed panel of computer scientists, lawyers, and social scientists. Focus areas include scoping claims to specific populations, explicitly arguing adverse impacts, and making interdisciplinary concepts native to the text.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

This guide addresses the unique challenge of structuring very long technical papers for academic venues like FOCS, where the committee reads a summary (the 'window') and expert reviewers must read the full proof (the 'supplementary'). It details best practices for organizing discretionary material, implementing robust pointer discipline, and ensuring self-containment to satisfy both quick-read and deep-dive readers.

This comprehensive guide provides a backward-planning workflow for submitting an Empirical Software Engineering (SE) paper to FSE. It manages the entire academic publication lifecycle, from initial venue confirmation and evidence lock to submission, major revision, and final presentation. It outlines critical milestones, deadlines, and potential failure modes to ensure a structured and successful academic publishing process.

This tool serves as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It does not write the paper itself, but rather diagnoses the current stage of your research and guides you on the optimal next specialized skill to utilize. Whether you are defining your contribution, analyzing data, structuring proofs, or preparing a rebuttal letter, this guide ensures you follow the correct academic sequence from topic selection to final submission.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of preparing a double-blind academic paper for its final, public, dual-published status across ACM and IEEE platforms. It systematically covers de-anonymization (restoring names, affiliations, and acknowledgments), ensuring all rebuttal promises are met within strict page limits, and managing complex metadata requirements (ORCID, CCS concepts, rights blocks). It serves as a final production checklist for authors.

This is a comprehensive audit checklist for submitting full-length research papers to the HRI conference. It guides authors through critical submission mechanics, including adhering to two-step deadlines (abstract then paper), selecting the correct technical track, managing formatting (8 pages, ACM template), ensuring double-blind anonymity across PDF, video, and data, and meeting human-participants ethics standards before final submission.

This is a comprehensive router guiding the entire lifecycle of an academic manuscript intended for the Human Resource Management (HRM) journal. It helps users navigate complex stages, from initial topic selection and theoretical positioning to advanced multilevel data analysis, refining writing style, and preparing for submission or rebuttal. It ensures the paper maintains the required dual contribution of academic rigor and practical business relevance.