Skill UI

This meta-skill is designed for drafting and producing new academic or research papers and LaTeX manuscripts. It orchestrates a multi-step workflow, handling source search, citation planning, drafting, length checks, and final LaTeX/PDF compilation. It supports both compact outlines and full, publication-ready manuscripts.

This tool serves as the central entry point and orchestrator for drafting an American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscript. It guides authors through the complex academic publishing lifecycle by determining the paper's specific track (e.g., Regular Article, Synthesis, Registered Report) and its current developmental stage (e.g., Idea, Theory, Data Analysis). It does not draft content; rather, it routes the user to the most relevant sub-skill for the next step in the writing process.

A specialized guide for structuring the policy implications section of high-level finance and trade economics manuscripts. It teaches authors how to move beyond vague suggestions, anchoring policy recommendations in concrete Chinese fiscal, financial, or trade policy tools, and linking them directly to the paper's empirical evidence and mechanisms.

A comprehensive guide for managing the entire lifecycle of major academic conference submissions (e.g., CVPR). It details critical timelines, from initial scope freezing and paper drafting to supplement submission, rebuttal writing, and resubmission strategies across different venues (ICCV, ECCV). Focuses heavily on project management and coordination to prevent process failures.

This comprehensive guide outlines a detailed, backward-planning workflow for submitting research papers to major AI conferences like ECAI or IJCAI-ECAI. It covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence type planning to abstract submission, full paper drafting, rebuttal response, and final camera-ready publication, ensuring authors meet strict deadlines and adhere to rigorous review standards.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

A comprehensive project management guide designed for managing high-stakes scientific conference submissions (e.g., INTERSPEECH). It maps the rigorous annual cycle, from initial drafting and submission deadlines to camera-ready production and final conference presentation. The guide outlines specific milestones, roles, risk patterns, and backward planning techniques to ensure timely and high-quality project completion.

This router guides researchers through the complex process of preparing a manuscript for the Journal of Economic Geography (JEG). It determines the optimal sequence of specialized skills needed at each stage—from initial topic selection, theoretical modeling, and robustness checks to drafting a rebuttal. It is designed to ensure the paper meets the unique interdisciplinary standards required to satisfy both economic and geographical reviewers.

A comprehensive workflow router designed for authors submitting highly theoretical manuscripts to the Journal of Economic Theory (JET). It guides users through the entire academic lifecycle—from initial scope assessment and theoretical positioning to drafting, revision (R&R), and final submission. It emphasizes adherence to JET's strict theory-first standards, ensuring every step reduces potential desk or referee risk.

A comprehensive preflight guide designed for authors submitting manuscripts to highly specialized academic journals. It covers essential checks beyond standard drafting, including stylistic conformity, mandatory disclosures (Ethics, Data Availability, AI usage), and ensuring the paper's theoretical fit within the journal's specific scope. Essential for maximizing submission success.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, double-blind academic rebuttal for conferences (like PerCom). This skill focuses on addressing explicit reviewer questions using only evidence already present in the submitted paper, thereby avoiding the promise of new experiments. It covers maintaining anonymity, structuring arguments, and focusing on core technical dimensions like cross-subject evaluation and metric soundness.

A comprehensive project management layer designed for navigating the entire academic conference lifecycle. It guides authors through critical phases, including topic selection, paper drafting, rigorous review response, camera-ready submission, and final presentation. The workflow emphasizes meticulous planning, role assignment, and maintaining academic integrity to prevent common project failures.