Skill UI

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of preparing a double-blind academic paper for its final, public, dual-published status across ACM and IEEE platforms. It systematically covers de-anonymization (restoring names, affiliations, and acknowledgments), ensuring all rebuttal promises are met within strict page limits, and managing complex metadata requirements (ORCID, CCS concepts, rights blocks). It serves as a final production checklist for authors.

This skill acts as a workflow router for writing academic papers for the journal 'China Rural Economy'. It does not replace specialized skills but guides the user through the entire manuscript process—from topic formulation and literature review to causal identification, mechanism testing, and handling reviewer comments (R&R). It ensures the structural and methodological completeness of the research article.

A comprehensive model detailing the rigorous, multi-stage peer review cycle for top-tier security conferences like IEEE S&P. It covers every phase, from initial submission and first-round screening to the three-way decision (Accept/Revise/Reject), ethical committee review, and post-acceptance shepherding. Ideal for authors needing to understand the structural constraints and adversarial nature of academic publishing.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission process for IEEE S&P, which operates across multiple self-contained cycles. This workflow map covers critical milestones like abstract registration, full paper submission, ethical review latency (IRB/disclosure), and planning for all three academic outcomes: Accept, Revise, or Reject. Essential for researchers managing multi-stage academic publishing timelines.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing academic manuscripts aimed at the International Economic Review (IER). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current bottleneck in the writing process. It guides the user through the entire rigorous workflow—from initial topic selection and theory modeling to empirical identification, robustness checks, and submission readiness—ensuring the paper is structured for maximum academic impact.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors preparing their accepted research papers for final publication (camera-ready). This process involves de-anonymization, restoring full author details, updating copyright and metadata, ensuring formal formatting, and managing the release of promised artifacts and code for reproducibility.

This router guides authors through the entire academic workflow for submissions to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It structures the process from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and rebuttal phase, ensuring the computational contribution is the central focus. It helps authors maintain flow and address the specific demands of the OR/CS intersection.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, mandatory steps required to transform an accepted academic draft into a final, camera-ready version for conference proceedings. It covers critical areas like complete de-anonymization, permanent archiving of datasets and code using DOIs, finalizing ethical statements (IRB), satisfying artifact availability requirements, and adhering to strict ACM publication standards. This process ensures the research output is publicly usable, traceable, and robust.

A comprehensive checklist for the final pre-deadline audit of a major academic conference submission (ISCA). It covers the two-step abstract and paper submission process, strict formatting rules (11-page limit, unlimited references), double-blind anonymization techniques, and essential steps for completing the HotCRP portal. Use this guide to ensure your paper meets all technical and procedural requirements before the deadline.

Provides a detailed and rigorous workflow guide for managing a full academic conference submission cycle (e.g., ISCA). It advises researchers on working backward from critical deadlines—from topic selection and baseline freezing to abstract writing, paper submission, handling reviews, and generating camera-ready artifacts—treating the academic process like a structured engineering schedule.

This comprehensive guide addresses the unique challenges of submitting research to top-tier conferences that do not include formal author-response or major revision rounds. It teaches authors a proactive strategy: how to pre-empt potential reviewer objections (e.g., novelty, scope limitations) by embedding necessary arguments, proofs, and context directly into the initial submission. Furthermore, it provides actionable plans for navigating both acceptance (camera-ready fixes) and rejection (diagnosis and strategic rerouting) without relying on traditional appeal processes.

This router guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of preparing a high-impact chemistry manuscript for the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). It does not replace specialized skills but rather dictates the correct sequence of actions—from scope checking and data framing to revision and final submission—ensuring a rigorous and systematic workflow.