Skill UI

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers to the AAMAS conference. It details all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, abstract submission, double-blind review, rebuttal, and final camera-ready preparation. Essential for managing complex research involving game theory and multi-agent systems.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for adapting research manuscripts for the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (AJRCCM). It assesses a study's scientific fit across the spectrum of basic science, translational research, and clinical trials. It ensures adherence to rigorous reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE, ARRIVE) and the journal's specific house style, helping authors significantly improve their submission readiness.

This skill guides authors through the unique requirements of submitting macro-policy research to venues like Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (BPEA). It serves as a comprehensive fit-check, covering journal positioning, evidence bar, required framing, and the conference/solicited submission workflow. Use it to re-frame academic work to meet the standards of real-time policy relevance and clear policy implication.

A comprehensive guide designed to assess whether a molecular or translational oncology study meets the high standards of a top-tier journal like Cancer Cell. It helps researchers critically evaluate their work's mechanistic depth and translational relevance, providing actionable steps before investing in full manuscript submission.

This skill provides a comprehensive pre-submission review for manuscripts targeting Cell Reports Medicine. It assesses the manuscript's fit regarding scope (translational and clinical research with mechanistic depth), evidence bar (requiring strong validation and causality), and house style. It helps authors determine if their work aligns with the journal's requirements before official submission.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to pressure-test the academic fit of their project for top-tier criminology journals. It guides authors on moving beyond descriptive data analysis to achieve general theoretical contributions, differentiating between Articles and Research Notes, and ensuring the work advances core debates in the field of crime and deviance.

This skill guides authors on submitting manuscripts to Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL). It evaluates whether quantitative research in geochemistry, geophysics, or planetary science presents a generalizable process or mechanism of broad scientific interest, adhering to Elsevier's rigorous house style and data policies. Use it as a fit/venue-selection tool for re-framing specialized regional studies into broadly relevant scientific mechanisms.

This comprehensive guide assists academic researchers in assessing the fit of their manuscripts for the journal Governance Studies. It outlines the journal's scope (national, local, digital governance, public policy), required theoretical depth, suitable methodologies (policy evaluation, case studies), and structural requirements. It serves as a crucial editorial checklist to prevent mis-submission and optimize the writing process for Chinese public administration and governance research.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers preparing liver biology or disease studies for submission to Hepatology (AASLD). It meticulously reviews the journal's scope, evidence bar, reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and required structure. It helps authors determine if their mechanistic or clinical work is rigorous enough and appropriately framed for a top-tier, international audience.

This guide assists researchers in transforming vague datasets or observations into robust, positive, and economics-driven research questions suitable for prestigious accounting journals (like JAE). It teaches key concepts, such as identifying economic friction, distinguishing between normative and positive questions, establishing plausible identification strategies, and mapping the topic to specific academic domains.

A comprehensive guide for researchers seeking to validate if their academic question genuinely centers on the entrepreneurial phenomenon and fits the scope of top-tier journals like the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV). It provides a rigorous 'fit test' based on centrality, disciplinary lens, and process stage, helping authors avoid common desk-reject pitfalls.

This skill helps researchers evaluate whether their macro-financial research question meets the scope and standards of the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME). It guides the identification of clear monetary, macro, or policy payoffs, ensuring the work addresses aggregate outcomes rather than narrow micro-effects, thereby significantly improving submission quality and target journal alignment.