Skill UI

A detailed guide for researchers submitting papers to China Industrial Economics. It outlines the journal's specific focus on rigorous empirical evidence, policy evaluation, industrial organization, and the digital/regional economy. The guide emphasizes best practices for methodology (e.g., DID, event-study), robustness checks, mechanism testing, and ensuring actionable policy implications.

This skill provides a comprehensive, year-round workflow guide for submitting research papers to the CoRL Conference on Robot Learning. It meticulously breaks down the annual cycle into manageable phases—including pre-submission preparation, managing reviewer feedback, crafting rebuttals, and preparing camera-ready versions. It assists teams in planning their efforts across critical milestones and navigating the academic publishing process.

This comprehensive orchestrator guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It is designed to ensure that the paper maintains a genuinely comparative argument—across countries, regions, or time—at every stage, routing the user to the correct next skill (e.g., theory building, research design, data analysis). It does not generate content; it directs the scholarly workflow.

This tool serves as the central orchestrator for Criminology manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial idea generation to final submission and rebuttal. It ensures the manuscript makes a theoretical or measurement contribution, rather than just reporting a correlation, by routing the user to the appropriate specialized skill based on the paper's stage and conceptual gap.

This comprehensive guide outlines a detailed, backward-planning workflow for submitting research papers to major AI conferences like ECAI or IJCAI-ECAI. It covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence type planning to abstract submission, full paper drafting, rebuttal response, and final camera-ready publication, ensuring authors meet strict deadlines and adhere to rigorous review standards.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

This tool serves as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It does not write the paper itself, but rather diagnoses the current stage of your research and guides you on the optimal next specialized skill to utilize. Whether you are defining your contribution, analyzing data, structuring proofs, or preparing a rebuttal letter, this guide ensures you follow the correct academic sequence from topic selection to final submission.

This is a comprehensive audit checklist for submitting full-length research papers to the HRI conference. It guides authors through critical submission mechanics, including adhering to two-step deadlines (abstract then paper), selecting the correct technical track, managing formatting (8 pages, ACM template), ensuring double-blind anonymity across PDF, video, and data, and meeting human-participants ethics standards before final submission.

This skill acts as a workflow router for writing academic papers for the journal 'China Rural Economy'. It does not replace specialized skills but guides the user through the entire manuscript process—from topic formulation and literature review to causal identification, mechanism testing, and handling reviewer comments (R&R). It ensures the structural and methodological completeness of the research article.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist for IEEE ICSME conference papers. Covers critical lifecycle steps including the abstract-then-paper two-step deadline, adherence to IEEE two-column formatting and page budgets, maintaining double-anonymous identity, and incorporating open science requirements like data availability statements and artifact links.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission process for IEEE S&P, which operates across multiple self-contained cycles. This workflow map covers critical milestones like abstract registration, full paper submission, ethical review latency (IRB/disclosure), and planning for all three academic outcomes: Accept, Revise, or Reject. Essential for researchers managing multi-stage academic publishing timelines.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors preparing their accepted research papers for final publication (camera-ready). This process involves de-anonymization, restoring full author details, updating copyright and metadata, ensuring formal formatting, and managing the release of promised artifacts and code for reproducibility.