Skill UI

This skill provides specialized internal auditing capabilities for ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AIMS. It helps compliance teams assess gaps across Clauses 4-10, build comprehensive AI risk registers with control mapping, and plan structured internal audits (Clause 9.2). Ideal for pre-certification readiness, scoping internal audit cycles, or integrating AI systems into existing quality/security management systems (ISMS/QMS).

This tool accesses a persistent FTS5 knowledge base containing previously indexed project documentation, local content, and session memory. Instead of feeding entire raw sources into the conversation context, it allows users to perform targeted, efficient searches using specific queries and source scoping. This is ideal for quickly retrieving technical details, project specifications, or historical context without lengthy re-reading.

A comprehensive guide for revising academic papers submitted to FAccT (Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency). It instructs authors on how to frame socio-technical contributions to be legible to a mixed panel of computer scientists, lawyers, and social scientists. Focus areas include scoping claims to specific populations, explicitly arguing adverse impacts, and making interdisciplinary concepts native to the text.

This skill guides researchers through the rigorous process of refining a preliminary accounting idea into a sharp, contribution-driven research question suitable for top academic journals like Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users identify the core accounting construct, define the mechanism (friction/channel), and ensure the study's focus is on accounting theory, rather than merely using accounting data in a general finance context.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of scholarly reviews, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and critical integrative syntheses. It maps out the necessary steps—from question scoping and protocol registration (PRISMA) through systematic searching, framework building, data coding, and final submission/revision—ensuring methodological rigor for high-impact academic journals.

A comprehensive guide designed for planning major academic conference submissions (e.g., SIGIR). It provides a detailed backward-planning calendar, mapping milestones from initial scoping and evidence building through to final camera-ready submission and presentation. This tool helps researchers manage complex multi-track coordination, identify potential failure modes, and utilize fallback conference pathways.

A comprehensive guide for accounting researchers on refining and scoping a high-quality research question suitable for top-tier journals like The Accounting Review (TAR). It teaches critical criteria, including ensuring the question is accounting-centered, methodologically identifiable, and makes a significant theoretical contribution, while also advising on the best fit among competing academic venues (TAR vs. JAR/JAE).