Skill UI

This tool acts as a comprehensive router for academic manuscript preparation, guiding authors through the complex stages of publishing for high-impact journals like PNAS Nexus. It does not write content, but rather diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it requires addressing open access rules, polishing the significance statement, refining figures, or structuring the rebuttal. It ensures authors follow the optimal, structured path from initial concept to final submission.

This router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of a manuscript targeting specialized academic journals like Research Policy (RP). It determines the optimal next step—whether it's refining the theory, developing methods, performing data analysis, structuring arguments, or responding to reviewer critiques (rebuttal). It ensures the paper maintains a strong focus on innovation studies and policy implications.

This guide provides comprehensive style and revision rules for manuscripts submitted to top-tier finance journals, such as the Review of Finance (RoF). It helps authors transform their research into highly polished, general-finance readable prose, focusing on structuring the abstract (under 150 words), adhering to double-blind anonymity, maintaining Chicago citation style, and meeting strict length constraints (e.g., 60-page cap). Use this when your core results are stable and you are polishing the final draft for publication.

This skill provides specialized guidance for authors aiming to publish in the flagship journal, Science. It covers the journal's unique requirements, including cross-disciplinary significance, policy relevance, rigorous methodology standards, and optimal structuring. Use it to re-frame and strengthen your manuscript before official submission.

A comprehensive guide for organizing academic conference papers. It dictates how to keep the main body focused on the core argument while moving detailed protocols, full derivations, and secondary data into unlimited appendices. It also provides best practices for anonymity and managing reviewer responses.

This guide details the critical 'triage protocol' for structuring academic papers for highly constrained venues like SIGIR. It outlines the three-container model (Paper Body, References, Repository) and provides expert advice on prioritizing review-critical evidence, implementing effective content compression techniques, and managing external repository material to ensure submissions meet strict page budgets without sacrificing soundness or review quality. Essential reading for researchers.

This comprehensive workflow acts as a guide for structuring academic manuscripts, particularly for high-level sociology journals. It diagnoses common writing pitfalls—such as weak theoretical grounding, policy focus, or lack of conceptual depth—and routes the user to the next necessary specialized skill (e.g., problem definition, theory dialogue, mechanism building, or rebuttal drafting). It ensures the final work meets the academic rigor required for top-tier publications.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript, from initial topic selection to final submission and revision. It does not replace specialized skills but directs the user to the correct next step, ensuring the conceptual advance is properly framed, argued, and polished for high-level academic journals. Essential for structuring complex theoretical contributions.

This skill helps authors assess the fit of their manuscripts for the journal Studies in Labor Economics. It analyzes whether the research theme, methodology, and contribution align with core labor economics topics (e.g., wages, employment, skills, social security). It provides detailed guidelines on structuring, required evidence, and potential revision directions before formal submission.

This comprehensive guide serves as a router for structuring a high-quality academic manuscript targeting The Accounting Review (TAR). It does not write the content but diagnoses the current stage of the research—whether it's an initial vague idea, preliminary results, or addressing reviewer feedback—and recommends the next specialized skill module to use, ensuring a methodical progression from topic selection through final rebuttal.

This skill guides legal scholars in transforming a broad legal topic into a single, sharp, contestable, and generalist thesis statement suitable for top-tier law journals. It forces the definition of the contribution's nature—whether descriptive, doctrinal, theoretical, or normative—and structures the argument into a clear, defensible 'contribution contract' for academic editors.