Skill UI

This comprehensive guide details the critical steps for converting an accepted EuroSys paper into the final ACM proceedings format. It covers complex template changes, mandatory metadata completion (eRights, ORCID), artifact linking, and ensuring absolute coherence between the final PDF and the ACM Digital Library record. Essential reading for authors preparing for final submission compliance.

A comprehensive final checklist designed for academic researchers preparing manuscripts for scholarly journal submission (e.g., double-blind review processes). This guide ensures adherence to complex publisher standards, covering mandatory elements such as complete manuscript anonymization, drafting the Data Availability Statement (DAS), assembling replication packages for statistical work, and meeting strict formatting and word count requirements. Use this before final upload to avoid avoidable desk returns.

This router guides authors through the complex submission process for rigorous quantitative sociology journals (ESR). It diagnoses the manuscript's stage (Idea, Article, Comment, Data Brief) and methodological shape (comparative, longitudinal, multilevel), ensuring the user is routed to the correct specialized skill set, rather than following a linear process. It is an orchestrator for academic research development.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final review process before submitting manuscripts to Field Crops Research (FCR). It ensures adherence to strict journal requirements, covering scope confirmation, formatting rules (abstract word count, highlights structure), comprehensive reporting (weather vs. phenology, statistics), and mandatory declarations (data availability, AI use). Use this guide to minimize rejection risk and streamline the submission process.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire writing lifecycle by first enforcing a critical 'scope gate' (checking for field-based, multi-environment relevance). It then intelligently routes the user based on the project stage, article type (e.g., Original Research, Review, Opinion), and necessary steps, ensuring the manuscript is scientifically viable before any content drafting begins.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

This comprehensive preflight checklist is designed for authors submitting manuscripts to Global Change Biology (GCB) via ScholarOne. It ensures compliance with critical publisher requirements, helping authors avoid common desk-rejection reasons. The checklist verifies scope fit, adherence to word/abstract limits, the inclusion of mandatory graphical abstracts, and proper data availability statements (requiring DOIs).

This tool serves as the central orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to Global Change Biology (GCB). It guides authors through the entire research lifecycle—from initial idea generation to final revision—by determining the appropriate article type and identifying the correct next step (skill). It ensures the manuscript maintains a mechanistic focus on global change impacts.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire publication lifecycle, from initial idea generation to final revision. It determines the correct stage, appropriate format (Research Article, Perspective), and routes the user to the necessary sub-skill, ensuring that the work maintains a strong focus on human and policy dimensions, rather than solely environmental results.

This comprehensive guide assists academic researchers in assessing the fit of their manuscripts for the journal Governance Studies. It outlines the journal's scope (national, local, digital governance, public policy), required theoretical depth, suitable methodologies (policy evaluation, case studies), and structural requirements. It serves as a crucial editorial checklist to prevent mis-submission and optimize the writing process for Chinese public administration and governance research.

This comprehensive guide walks authors through the rigorous, post-acceptance editing process typical of top-tier scholarly journals, such as Harvard Law Review. It covers key stages: defending substantive arguments, enforcing technical style (Bluebook), and performing the critical source-pull/cite-check, ensuring every citation is verifiable. It focuses on collaborative relationship management and timely execution.

This guide acts as the orchestrator for submitting scholarly articles to Harvard Law Review (HLR). It maps the complex, multi-stage lifecycle of legal academic writing, guiding users through every step from initial topic selection and preemption checks to argument structure, rigorous Bluebook citation, and final student-editor review. It is essential for understanding the unique, student-edited model and required submission strategy in legal academia.