Skill UI

Run a two-thread adversarial review of a theory paper: a fresh reviewer writes the strongest 200-word rejection memo, then a second fresh reviewer defends point-by-point and surfaces still-unresolved critical issues. Use before submission or for rebuttal preparation.

This tool serves as an orchestrator for manuscripts submitted to the Annals of the AAG. It guides authors through the complex submission process by helping define the appropriate academic area (e.g., Human Geography, Physical Geography), the article format (Article, Commentary), and the sequential developmental stages—from topic selection and theory building to data analysis and final submission. It ensures the work is framed legitimately as *geography*.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers to the AAMAS conference. It details all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, abstract submission, double-blind review, rebuttal, and final camera-ready preparation. Essential for managing complex research involving game theory and multi-agent systems.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed to guide authors through the rigorous preparation process for submitting academic manuscripts to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It covers critical steps such as adopting double-blind anonymity, mandatory author commitment forms, ensuring originality, and meeting the high formatting standards required for top-tier publications in control and automation theory.

This comprehensive workflow acts as a systematic router for authors writing empirical management papers for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theory development, through rigorous methodology and data analysis, to refining writing style, and finally managing the submission and rebuttal process. It ensures the manuscript meets the high standards of theoretical and empirical contribution required by top-tier academic journals.

This comprehensive workflow guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of developing a purely theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) submission. It acts as a router, directing the user to specific specialized skills at each point of the scholarly writing process, from topic selection to contribution framing and final polish. It emphasizes that the deliverable is pure theory, not empirical data.

This tool serves as the central entry point and orchestrator for drafting an American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscript. It guides authors through the complex academic publishing lifecycle by determining the paper's specific track (e.g., Regular Article, Synthesis, Registered Report) and its current developmental stage (e.g., Idea, Theory, Data Analysis). It does not draft content; rather, it routes the user to the most relevant sub-skill for the next step in the writing process.

This tool acts as a diagnostic router for writing manuscripts intended for the Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It does not write the content but guides the user through the entire research and publication cycle—from initial topic selection and theory development, through methodology, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next specialized skill to focus on.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for the entire manuscript lifecycle directed towards publishing in Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR). It does not generate content but guides the user through the necessary steps, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final rebuttal preparation. Use it when you are unsure of the next optimal step or are bouncing between different stages of writing.

This guide assists researchers in transforming empirical findings into high-level, institutionally relevant policy implications for top-tier academic journals (e.g., finance and economics). It teaches how to shift focus from actionable 'recommendations' to theoretical 'implications,' ensuring the policy section is evidence-backed, macro-level, and deeply integrated with the paper's core theory and Chinese context.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for Communication Research (CR) manuscripts. It guides users through the entire academic publishing lifecycle, assessing whether a manuscript is quantitative, theory-driven, and methodologically sound. It routes the user to the appropriate specialized sub-skill (e.g., design, analysis, theory-building) based on the study type (experiment, survey, content analysis) and the current stage of the research process.

This comprehensive orchestrator guides authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It is designed to ensure that the paper maintains a genuinely comparative argument—across countries, regions, or time—at every stage, routing the user to the correct next skill (e.g., theory building, research design, data analysis). It does not generate content; it directs the scholarly workflow.